1887

Abstract

Summary

Large source-receiver offset acquisition offers the benefits of high data redundancy and improved illumination. However, large-offset recordings are generally expensive to acquire and the vast majority of academic research deals with a low channel count and target depths that significantly exceed the available offset range. Diffractions provide superior illumination compared to reflections, but typically have low amplitudes. We present a scheme that specifically targets the weak but highly illuminating diffracted background through automated adaptive subtraction of the dominant reflected contributions, while making only use of the available near-offset channel. Based on local stacking and coherence evaluation, the recorded diffracted events are treated as passive source wavefields, which are characterized in terms of local properties of wavefronts emerging at the registration surface. In an industrial field data example offshore Israel, where large offsets were available, we show that the diffraction-based wavefront inversion of only the near-offset channel leads to results, which are in reasonable agreement with available geological interpretations. By application to an academic low-fold dataset recorded near Santorini in the Aegean Sea, we demonstrate that the suggested inversion scheme offers the opportunity to construct laterally resolved depth-velocity models even in the actual absence of large-offset recordings.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700864
2017-06-12
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauer, A., Schwarz, B. and Gajewski, D.
    [2016] Enhancement of prestack diffraction data and attributes using a traveltime decomposition approach. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 60(3), 471–486.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. [2017] Utilizing diffractions in wavefront tomography. Geophysics, 80(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dell, S. and Gajewski, D.
    [2011] Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging. Geophysics, 76(5), S187–S195.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Duveneck, E.
    [2004] Velocity model estimation with data-derived wavefront attributes. Geophysics, 69(1), 265–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fomel, S., Landa, E. and Taner, M.T.
    [2007] Poststack velocity analysis by separation and imaging of seismic diffractions. Geophysics, 72(6), U89–U94.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hübscher, C., Ruhnau, M. and Nomikou, P.
    [2015] Volcano-tectonic evolution of the polygenetic Kolumbo submarine volcano/Santorini (Aegean Sea). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 291, 101–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jäger, R., Mann, J., Höcht, G. and Hubral, P.
    [2001] Common-reflection-surface stack: Image and attributes. Geophysics, 66(1), 97–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Khaidukov, V., Landa, E. and Moser, T.J.
    [2004] Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69(6), 1478–1490.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Netzeband, G., Hübscher, C. and Gajewski, D.
    [2006] The structural evolution of the Messinian evaporites in the Levantine Basin. Marine Geology, 230(3), 249–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schwarz, B., Bauer, A. and Gajewski, D.
    [2016] Passive seismic source localization via common-reflection-surface attributes. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 60(3), 531–546.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Virieux, J. and Operto, S.
    [2009] An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74(6), WCC1–WCC26.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700864
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700864
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error