1887

Abstract

Summary

Kirchhoff images can suffer from uneven illumination and contamination by migration artefacts, particularly in regions of more complex geology. One issue is that migration is not a true inverse operation — it is based on the adjoint of the forward modelling operator. In contrast, least-squares migration approximates the inverse of the forward modelling and, with a sufficiently accurate velocity model, the impact of the detrimental effects on the image can be reduced. Here, we describe the benefits of a non-iterative Kirchhoff least-squares method, usually referred to as migration deconvolution. We present a practical workflow to demonstrate that the method can be used to attenuate image artefacts, particularly the strong wave-front swings, to help balance image illumination, and increase clarity and robustness of AVO attributes. We illustrate our workflow on a real data example from offshore Gabon, in which we are careful to ensure that both the conventional and migration deconvolution have the same pre-processing sequence applied prior to imaging. This sequence includes elements (de-ghosting, spectral balancing, regularization and interpolation) designed to improve the quality of the conventional Kirchhoff image, as well as de-multiple and de-noise processing. We observe a distinct, yet realistic, uplift from the migration deconvolution over conventional migration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700897
2017-06-12
2020-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fletcher, R.P., Nichols, D., Bloor, R.M. and Coates, R.T.
    [2015] Least-squares migration: data domain versus image domain. 77th EAGE Conference & Exhibitions, Extended Abstracts, We N106 06.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Guitton, A.
    [2004] Amplitude and kinematic corrections of migrated images for non-unitary imaging operators. Geophysics, 69, 1017–1024.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu, J., SchusterG., and ValasekP. A.
    [2001] Poststack migration deconvolution. Geophysics, 66 (3), 939–952.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, Y., Dutta, G., Dai, W., Wang, X., Schuster, G.T. and Yu, J.
    [2014] Making the most out of least-squares migration. The Leading Edge, 33 (9), 954–960.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Khalil, A., Hoeber, H., Roberts, G. and Perrone, F.
    [2016] An alternative to least-squares imaging using data-domain matching filters. 86th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4188–4192.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nemeth, T., Wu, C. and Schuster, G.T.
    [1999] Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection data. Geophysics, 64 (1), 208–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Soubaras, R., and R.Dowle
    [2010] Variable-depth streamer — a broadband marine solution. First Break, 28 (12), 89–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, P., Gomes, A., Zhang, Z. and Wang, M.
    [2016] Least-squares RTM: Reality and possibilities for subsalt imaging. 86th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4204–4209.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700897
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700897
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error