1887

Abstract

Summary

Multi-attribute classification technologies, including supervised and unsupervised methods, play an important role in seismic interpretation. Providing that enough labeled samples are available, supervised methods usually obtain some credible results. However, for seismic data, the unlabeled data is huge but the labeled data is usually limited. Therefore, the combination of supervised and unsupervised methods is a feasible idea. As a common unsupervised feature learning algorithm used in deep learning, sparse autoencoder can realize automatic feature extraction using the unlabeled data. In this abstract, we introduce the sparse autoencoder and design a semi-supervised learning framework for multi-attribute classification applications by combining unsupervised feature learning and supervised classification. In the proposed framework, the original data of both labeled and unlabeled samples are used to train a sparse autoencoder at first, and then encoded to get some features for better representation. After that, the features of these labeled samples are used to train a classifier. At last, we apply this classifier on these unlabeled samples to obtain the final classification results. To demonstrate the validity of the designed technology, we give a gas chimney detection example. Results show that the multiattribute classification technology based on sparse autoencoder outperforms the traditional multilayer perceptron method.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700920
2017-06-12
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chang-kaiZ., and Wen-kaiL.
    2010. Seismic attributes selection based on SVM for hydrocarbon reservoir prediction, 2010 SEG Annual Meeting.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DengJ., ZhangZ., MarchiE., and SchullerB.
    2013. Sparse autoencoder-based feature transfer learning for speech emotion recognition, Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2013 Humaine Association Conference on.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. HuC., LuW., JiangX., and GaoX.
    2012. Semi-supervised Classification of Seismic Attributes, 74th EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating EUROPEC 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. MarroquínI. D., BraultJ. J., and HartB. S.
    , 2008. A visual data-mining methodology for seismic facies analysis: Part 1—Testing and comparison with other unsupervised clustering methods, Geophysics, 74(1): P1–P11.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MeldahlP., HegglandR., BrilB., and de GrootP.
    1999. The chimney cube, an example of semi-automated detection of seismic objects by directive attributes and neural networks: Part I; methodology, SEG, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. NgA.
    , 2011. Sparse autoencoder, CS294A Lecture notes, 72: 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. RainaR., BattleA., LeeH., PackerB., and NgA. Y.
    2007. Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data, Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. XiongW., WanZ., BaiX., XingH., ZuoH., ZhuK., and YangS.
    2014. AdaBoost-based Multiattribute Classification Technology and Its Application, 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700920
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201700920
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error