1887

Abstract

Summary

Noise is a persistent feature in seismic data and poses a particular challenge for microseismic monitoring where events are often at or below the noise level of individual recordings. This work introduces a statistics-driven noise suppression technique that whitens noise through the calculation and removal of the noise’s covariance. Using the Aquistore CO2 storage site as an example, the technique is shown to reduce the noise energy by a factor of 3.5 whilst having negligible effect on the seismic wavelet. This opens up the opportunity to identify and image events below current detection levels. Furthermore, while the technique has been discussed with respect to a microseismic monitoring application, it is applicable to any situation where noise may be considered as a multivariate Gaussian distribution, including other exploration, global and hazard monitoring scenarios.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701061
2017-06-12
2020-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Birnie, C., Chambers, K., Angus, D. and Stork, A.
    [2016] Analysis and models of pre-injection surface seismic array noise recorded at the Aquistore carbon storage site. Geophysical Journal International, 206(2), 1246–1260.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Forghani-Arani, F., Batzle, M., Behura, J., Willis, M., Haines, S.S. and Davidson, M.
    [2012] Noise suppression in surface microseismic data. The Leading Edge, 31(1496–1501), 1496–1501.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hom, R.A. and Johnson, C.R.
    [1985] Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Express.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Larsen, S. and Harris, D.
    [1993] Seismic wave propagation through a low-velocity nuclear rubble zone. Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA(United States).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Massart, D.L., Vandeginste, B., Deming, S., Michotte, Y. and Kaufman, L.
    [1988] Chemometrics: a textbook.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Maxwell, S.
    [2010] Microseismic: Growth born from success. The Leading Edge, 29(3), 338–343.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nørmark, E.
    [2011] Wind and rain induced noise on reflection seismic data. In: Near Surface 2011-the 17th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Roach, L.A., White, D.J. and Roberts, B.
    [2015] Assessment of 4D seismic repeatability and CO2 detection limits using a sparse permanent land array at the Aquistore CO2 storage site. Geophysics, 80(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schilke, S., Probert, T., Bradford, I., Özbek, A. and Robertsson, J.
    [2014] Use of Surface Seismic Patches for Hydraulic Fracture Monitoring. In: 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701061
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701061
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error