1887

Abstract

Summary

Marchenko focusing utilizes only reflection measurements at the Earth’s surface and an estimate of the direct wave from a focusing point in the subsurface to the acquisition level in order to retrieve the Green’s function between the two. However, the method suffers when an erroneous scaling of the amplitudes and/or a constant phase-shift is introduced to the reflection response, and artifacts caused by internal multiples are not fully suppressed in the retrieved subsurface wave fields. We propose a workflow to calibrate the reflection response, prior to Green’s function retrieval via Marchenko focusing, using additional information in the form of a VSP dataset. First a virtual VSP dataset is estimated via Marchenko focusing, to subsequently compare its upgoing component to the upgoing part of the recorded VSP. Thereby, making it possible to correct for a constant phase shift applied to the reflection data. By identifying the minimum residual energy between the virtual VSP and the recorded VSP wave fields, an erroneous scaling of the reflection response can also be corrected. This workflow leads to a more robust Marchenko focusing, where the reflection response can be redatumed to a target zone in the subsurface and used for ghost-free imaging.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701132
2017-06-12
2020-04-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berryhill, J.R.
    [1984] Wave-equation datuming before stack.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Broggini, F., Wapenaar, K., Van Der Neut, J. and Snieder, R.
    [2014] Data-driven Green’s function retrieval and application to imaging with multidimensional deconvolution. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119(1), 425–441.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. van der Neut, J., Vasconcelos, I. and Wapenaar, K.
    [2015a] On Green’s function retrieval by iterative substitution of the coupled Marchenko equations. Geophysical Journal International, 203(2), 792–813.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. van der Neut, J., Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J. and Slob, E.
    [2015b] Practical challenges in adaptive Marchenko imaging, 4505–4509.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ravasi, M., Vasconcelos, I., Kritski, A., Curtis, A., Filho, C.A.d.C. and Meles, G.A.
    [2016] Target-oriented Marchenko imaging of a North Sea field. Geophysical Journal International, 205(1), 99–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wapenaar, K., Thorbecke, J., van der Neut, J., Broggini, F., Slob, E. and Snieder, R.
    [2014] Green’s function retrieval from reflection data, in absence of a receiver at the virtual source position. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(5), 2847.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701132
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701132
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error