Comparing Spectral-Element Numerical Results with Laboratory Data: An Example for a Topographical Model

References

1. Bretaudeau, F., Leparoux, D., Durand, O. and Abraham, O.
   [2011] Small-scale modeling of onshore seismic experiment: A tool to validate numerical modeling and seismic imaging methods. Geophysics, 76(5):T101–T112.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Chen, G.
   [1996] Comparison of 2-D numerical viscoelastic waveform modeling with ultrasonic physical modeling. Geophysics, 61(3):862–871.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Evans, J.F.
   [1959] Seismic model experiments with shear waves. Geophysics, 24(1):40–48.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Favretto-Cristini, N., Tantsereva, A., Cristini, P., Ursin, B., Komatitsch, D. and Aizenberg, A.M.
   [2014] Numerical modeling of zero-offset laboratory data in a strong topographic environment: results for a spectral-element method and a discretized Kirchhoff integral method. Earthquake Science, 27(4):391–399.
   [Google Scholar]
5. French, W.S.
   [1974] Two-dimensional and three-dimensional migration of model-experiment reflection profiles. Geophysics, 39(3):265–277.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Komatisch, D. and Vilotte, J.P.
   [1998] The spectral-element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88(2):368–392.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Sandia National Laboratories
   [2016] Cubit 15.2. Albuquerque, NM, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Tantsereva, A., Ursin, B., Favretto-Cristini, N., Cristini, P. and Aizenberg, A.M.
   [2014] Numerical modeling of 3D zero-offset laboratory data by a discretized Kirchhoff integral method. Geophysics, 79(2):T77–T90. + Errata: Geophysics, 79(5):Y3–Y4
   [Google Scholar]
9. Tromp, J., Komatitsch, D. and LiuQ.
   [2008] Spectral-element and adjoint methods in seismology. Communications in Computational Physics, 3(1):1–32.
   [Google Scholar]