1887

Abstract

Summary

Audio-Magnetotellurics (AMT) is an electromagnetic geophysical method based on passive measurements of the induced electric currents in the ground by atmospheric sources which mostly originate from global lightning activity. Each lightning strike generates different waves with distinct time-frequency properties. Two major difficulties arise in AMT acquisition and processing. The first one lies in the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio of natural signals compared to anthropogenic signals. The second one is the so-called AMT dead-band, a specific frequency band (generally from 1 kHz to 5 kHz) where the level of natural signals energy remains low. Using the continuous wavelet transform, we identify electromagnetic (EM) waves in the time-frequency plane and we then invert the response function. Two criteria are used for detection: high signal-to-noise ratio and specific shape of local maxima in the time-frequency plane. The determination of AMT response functions are based on a hierarchical bootstrap scheme. We illustrate this methodology on AMT data acquired near Chambon-La-Forêt magnetic observatory. By using the new procedure on this dataset, we are able to, on the one hand, drastically reduce the AMT dead-band width, and on the other hand, greatly reduce the confidence interval of the AMT response functions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701355
2017-06-12
2019-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chave, A. D. & Thomson, D. J.
    , 2004. Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation, Geophysical Journal International, 130(2), 475–496.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J.
    , 1993. An introduc-tion to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Field, C. A. and Welsh, A. H.
    (2007), Bootstrapping clustered data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 69, 369–390
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Huber, P. J.
    , 1973. Robust regression: asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo, Ann. Stat., 1, 799–821.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Larnier, H., Sailhac, P., & Chambodut, A.
    , 2016. New applications of wavelets in magnetotelluric data processing: Reducing impedance bias. Earth, Planets and Space, 68(70)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Maraun, D., Kurths, J. & Holschneider, M.
    , 2007. Nonstationary gaussian processes in wavelet domain: Synthesis, estimation, and significance testing, Physical Review E, 75.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Torrence, C. & Compo, G. P.
    , 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analysis, Bulletin of the American Geophysical Society, 79(1), 61–78
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang, Y. & Paulson, K. V.
    , 1997. Enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio in natural source transient magnetotelluric data with wavelet transform, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 149, 405–419.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701355
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701355
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error