1887

Abstract

Summary

Low frequencies have been demonstrated to be very useful in seismic processing, inversion and interpretation. However, seismic datasets acquired via early seismic survey is devoid of low frequencies (e.g., 0–8 Hz). Although the frequency bandwidth can be extended down to ∼1.5 Hz via modern expensive acquisition technique, the existence of multiple wave, surface wave and random noise in seismic data readily damages the available weak low-frequency signals. Therefore, developing processing methods to boost low-frequency signals is often necessary as well. The lack of low frequencies results in some false weak signals, and thereby causes the subsurface sparse reflectivity series non-sparse. The sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) method can invert for a sparse reflectivity series from bandlimited data, due to the utilization of a hierarchical Gaussian priori. Consequently, SBL reflectivity inversion has the ability of retrieving low frequencies. The long wavelength components of velocity, which is usually a good initial model for generating the absolute velocity, can be subsequently extracted from the recovering low-frequency information by using the conventional velocity inversion. Synthetic and real borehole-side seismic data examples illustrate that the method combined SBL reflectivity inversion with velocity inversion can provide credible long wavelength components of velocity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701365
2017-06-12
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Goloshubin, G., VanSchuyver, C., Korneev, V., Silin, D., and Vingalov, V.
    [2006] Reservoir imaging using low frequencies of seismic reflections. The Leading Edge25, 527–531.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Russell, B., and Hampson, D.
    [1991] A comparison of post-stack seismic inversion methods. 61st Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 876–878.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ten Kroode, F., Bergler, S., Corsten, C., Maag, J., Strijbos, F., and Tijhof, H.
    [2013] Broadband seismic data— The importance of low frequencies. Geophysics78(2),WA3–WA14.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Walden, A., and Hosken, J.
    [1986] The nature of the non-Gaussianity of primary reflection coefficients and its significance for deconvolution. Geophysical Prospecting34, 1038–1066.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Walker, C., and Ulrych, T.
    [1983] Autoregressive recovery of the acousic impedance. Geophysics, 1338–1350.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, P., Zhang, F., and Li, X.
    [2015] Compensation of low frequencies using heterodyning and empirical mode decomposition. 85st Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts, 216–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Y., Huang, H., Yuan, S., Zhang, S., and Li, B.
    [2016] Gas prediction using low-frequency components of variable-depth streamer seismic data applied to the deepwater area of the South China Sea. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering34, 1310–1320.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yuan, S., and Wang, S.
    [2013] Spectral sparse Bayesian learning reflectivity inversion. Geophysical Prospecting61, 735–746.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701365
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701365
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error