1887

Abstract

Summary

The shifted hyperbola was first introduced almost 40 years ago as an alternative to the conventional NMO hyperbola. In previous works it has been shown that the shifted hyperbola has unique properties, which make it a feasible alternative to conventional NMO stacking. In addition to the appealing fact, that, due to the independence of the zero-offset reference traveltime, the shifted hyperbola generally leads to stretch-free NMO correction, it was also demonstrated that, for the same reason, its moveout correction can be implemented in a highly parallel fashion. For multi-layered inhomogeneous media, previous authors have found that the shifted hyperbola provides high accuracy, which in certain situations can surpass the conventional NMO approach. Despite all its successes, to our knowledge, the shifted hyperbola has never been convinvincingly extended to 3D acquisitions. In this work, we introduce a formulation of the shifted hyperbola that is valid in three dimensions. The new approximation allows an efficient implementation and does not cause the undesired effect of wavelet stretch. A numerical 3D example indicates that the new 3D shifted hyperbola, is more accurate than the conventional 3D NMO, and hence, bears the potential of an improved stacked volume and more reliable stacking parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701427
2017-06-12
2020-09-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abakumov, I., Schwarz, B. and Gajewski, D.
    [2017] Normal moveout in a 3D auxiliary medium. In: 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aleixo, R. and Schleicher, J.
    [2010] Traveltime approximations for q-P waves in vertical transversely isotropy media. Geophysical Prospecting, 58(2), 191–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Bazelaire, E.
    [1988] Normal moveout revisited: Inhomogeneous media and curved interfaces. Geophysics, 53(2), 143–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Castle, R.J.
    [1994] A theory of normal moveout. Geophysics, 59(6), 983–999.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grechka, V. and Tsvankin, I.
    [1998] 3-D description of normal moveout in anisotropic inhomogeneous media. Geophysics, 63(3), 1079–1092.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Levin, F.K.
    [1971] Apparent velocity from dipping interface reflections. Geophysics, 36(3), 510–516.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Malovichko, A.A.
    [1978] A new representation of the traveltime curve of reflected waves in horizontally layered media. Applied Geophysics, 91(1), 47–53. (in Russian).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mayne, W.H.
    [1962] Common reflection point horizontal data stacking techniques. Geophysics, 27(6), 927–938.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Schwarz, B. and Gajewski, D.
    [2017] The two faces of NMO. The Leading Edge, accepted for publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Siliqi, R. and Bousquié, N.
    [2000] Anelliptic time processing based on a shifted hyperbola approach. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2000. 2245–2248.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Stovas, A. and Fomel, S.
    [2012] Shifted hyperbola moveout approximation revisited. Geophysical Prospecting, 60(3), 395–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thore, P.D., de Bazelaire, E. and Rays, M.P.
    [1994] The three-parameter equation: an efficient tool to enhance the stack. Geophysics, 59(2), 297–308.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ursin, B. and Stovas, A.
    [2006] Traveltime approximations for a layered transversely isotropic medium. Geophysics, 71(2), D23–D33.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Vermeer, G.J.O.
    [2002] 3D seismic survey design. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701427
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201701427
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error