1887

Abstract

Summary

Estimates of material properties such as ice content or unfrozen water content are critical for thermal modelling of the response of permafrost to climate forcing, understanding contaminant flow and transport, or for predicting the behaviour of permafrost as an engineering substrate. We utilize time-lapse electrical resistivity surveys to examine the potential for imaging relative changes in unfrozen water content for cold continuous permafrost in the Canadian Arctic. Electrical resistivity data were collected from 2012/08 to 2015/06 at semi-regular time intervals using a permanent electrode installation at Iqaluit International Airport in Iqaluit, Nunavut. Using postinversion model differencing, we observe significant changes in electrical resistivity and we infer changes in unfrozen water content that appear consistent with temperature records. The most prevalent changes in resistivity are not limited to the active layer, but extend from 1–8 m depth in a zone of significant temperature fluctuation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702023
2017-09-03
2022-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Daniels, J.J., Keller, G.V. and Jacobson, J.J.
    [1976] Computer-assisted interpretation of electromagnetic soundings over a permafrost section. Geophysics, 41, 752–765.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fortier, R., LeBlanc, A.-M., Allard, M., Buteau, S. and Calmels, F.
    [2008] Internal structure and conditions of permafrost mounds at Umiujaq in Nunavik, Canada, inferred from field investigation and electrical resistivity tomography. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 45, 367–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Grimm, R.E. and Stillman, D.E.
    [2015] Field Test of Detection and Characterisation of Subsurface Ice using Broadband Spectral-Induced Polarisation. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 26, 28–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hauck, C.
    [2002] Frozen ground monitoring using DC resistivity tomography. Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kneisel, C., Hauck, C., Fortier, R. and Moorman, B.
    [2008] Advances in geophysical methods for permafrost investigations. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 19, 157–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Loke, M.H., Dahlin, T. and Rucker, D.F.
    [2014] Smoothness-constrained time-lapse inversion of data from 3D resistivity surveys. Near Surface Geophysics, 12, 5–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oldenborger, G.A., Knoll, M.D., Routh, P.S. and LaBrecque, D.J.
    [2007] Time-lapse ERT monitoring of an injection/withdrawal experiment in an shallow unconfined aquifer. Geophysics, 72, F177–F187.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Oldenborger, G.A. and LeBlanc, A.-M.
    [2015] Geophysical characterization of permafrost terrain at Iqaluit International Airport, Nunavut. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 123, 36–49.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702023
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error