1887

Abstract

Summary

In this work 10 different methods to calculate an effective permeability are used to generate homogenous rock models based on a heterogeneous rock model of an existing geologic structure in Northern Germany. Subsequently, simulation results of a hypothetical H2 storage operation obtained for the various homogeneous models are compared to those of the heterogeneous ensemble to evaluate the applicability of the individual methods. It is shown that the upper bound of storage performance metrics such as storage flow rates or power output can be estimated for the given structure using simulations in which permeability is estimated by an arithmetic mean. Likewise, the lower bound of the results obtained for the heterogeneous ensemble can be estimated by simulations in which effective permeability is estimated using a geometric average of the vertical arithmetic averages. The overpressure signal induced by the storage operation are slightly underestimated in the far field of the storage wells, being within 0.5 bars of the median of the heterogeneous ensemble for most homogeneous cases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702138
2017-09-03
2020-07-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamek, F., Aundrup, T., Glaunsinger, W., Kleimaier, M., Landinger, H., Leuthold, M., Lunz, B., Moser, A., Pape, C., Pluntke, H., Rotering, N., Sauer, U., Sterner, M., Wellßow, W.
    [2012] Ener-giespeicher für die Energiewende - Speicherungsbedarf und Auswirkungen auf das Übertragungsnetz für Szenarien bis 2050. VDE e.V., Frankfurt a. M, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T.
    [1946] Hydraulic Properties of Porous Media. Hydrology Papers. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burton, M., Kumar, N., Bryant, S.L.
    [2009] CO2 injectivity into brine aquifers: Why relative permeability matters as much as absolute permeability. Energy Procedia, 1, 3091–3098. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.089
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.089 [Google Scholar]
  4. Gaupp, R.
    [1991] Zur Fazies und Diagenese des Mittelrhät-Hauptsandsteins im Gasfeld Thönse. In: Achilles, H. and Ahrendt, H. (Eds.) Das Gasfeld Thönse in Niedersachsen – Ein Unikat. Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, 34–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gutjahr, A.L., Gelhar, L.W., Bark, A.A., MacMillan, J.R.
    [1978] Stochastic analysis of spatial variability in subsurface flows: 2. Evaluation and application. Water Resources Research, 14, 953–959, doi: 10.1029/WR014i005p00953
    https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i005p00953 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hese, F.
    [2012] 3D Modellierung und Visualisierung von Untergrundstrukturen für die Nutzung des unterirdischen Raumes in Schleswig-Holstein, Dissertation, Kiel University, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Klaus, T., Vollmer, C., Werner, K., Lehmann, H., Müschen, K.
    [2010] Energy Target 2050: 100% Renewable Electricity Supply. Federal Environment Agency, Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Pfeiffer, W.T., Beyer, C., Bauer, S.
    [2017] Porous media hydrogen storage in a heterogeneous formation - Dimensioning and induced hydraulic effects. Petroleum Geoscience, first published online March 9, 2017. doi: 10.1144/petgeo2016‑050
    https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2016-050 [Google Scholar]
  9. Renard, P. and de Marsily, G.
    [1997] Calculating equivalent permeability: a review. Advances in Water Resources, 20, 253–278, doi: 10.1016/S0309‑1708(96)00050‑4.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00050-4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Sørensen, B.
    (1975) Energy and Resources. Science, 189(4199), 255–260.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702138
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702138
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error