1887

Abstract

Summary

In order to improve the understanding of sedimentological heterogeneities on varies scales, from micro-scale thin section to macro-scale correlations, a joint project was initiated between the University of Tübingen (Germany) and ENI S.p.A. This outcrop study focused on the characterization and modelling of the largest and thickest wedge (wedge 3) of the Quaderkalk Formation. The Middle Triassic Quaderkalk Formation in SW Germany composed of four lithostratigraphic separated bioclast-rich wedges and represents an outcrop analogue for sub-seismic scale carbonate ramp reservoirs. Facies range from mud-rich, low-energy offshoal (non-reservoir facies) to bioclast-rich, high-energy shoal (potential reservoir facies), deposited on an epeiric carbonate ramp. Instead of a continuous facies belt, tens of kilometres-scale correlations indicate several separated high-energy shoal areas forming a shoal complex “mosaic”, which is controlled by a cycle architecture. Integrating all data of an intensive field study, two 3D facies models were produced: (1) a 30 × 30 km model to simulate the large-scale facies pattern and (2) a more detailed 10 × 10 km small-scale model to simulate internal shoal reservoir heterogeneities. The results highlight the importance of realistic geological, especially sequence-stratigraphic input in order to optimize the simulations of carbonate shoals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702374
2017-10-04
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aigner, T.
    [1985] Storm Depositional Systems.Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Borkhataria, R., Aigner, T. and Pipping, K.J.
    [2006] An unusual, muddy, epeiric carbonate reservoir: The Lower Muschelkalk (Middle Triassic) of the Netherlands.AAPG Bulletin, 90 (1), 61–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, S.
    [2003] Quantitative Analysis of Carbonate Sandbodies: Outcrop Analog Study From An Epicontinental Basin (Triassic Germany). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. DSK, D.S.K.
    [2002] Stratigraphische Tabelle von Deutschland.Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagdorn, H.
    [2004] Das Muschelkalkmuseum Ingelfingen.Heilbron.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Palermo, D., Aigner, T., Nardon, S. and Blendinger, W.
    [2010] Three-dimensional facies modeling of carbonate sand bodies: Outcrop analog study in an epicontinental basin (Triassic, southwest Germany).AAPG Bulletin, 94 (4), 475–512.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Petrovic, A. and Aigner, T.
    [in review] Are shoal reservoirs discrete bodies? A coquina shoal outcrop analogue from the Mid-Triassic Upper Muschelkalk, SW Germany. Journal of Petroleum Geology.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Petrovic, A., Aigner, T and Pontiggia, M.
    [submitted] Reservoir heterogeneities in ramp carbonates: A new high-resolution approach for 3D facies modelling. Journal of Petroleum Geology.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702374
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702374
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error