1887

Abstract

Summary

A statistical evaluation of earthquake activity for Tunceli province of Turkey was made by applying standard normal deviate Z-test. For this purpose, regional and temporal changes of the seismicity rate at the beginning of 2017 was analyzed by using ZMAP software. The data set is compiled from Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute. There are 5462 events from September 21, 1970 to December 30, 2016 with magnitude larger than and equal to 1.1. Completeness magnitude is estimated as 2.8. Three regions indicating important quiescence anomaly were observed at the beginning of 2017. These anomalies are found centered at (a) 39.24°N-39.51°E (around city center, and between Ovacık and Pülümür), (b) 38.98°N-39.41°E (including Pertek) and (c) 38.96°N-39.78°E (region including Mazgirt). These quiescence anomalies are observed in the recent years and they start approximately at the years of 2012 and 2015. The regions in which seismic quiescence are found may be the possible areas for the future earthquakes and for this reason, special attention should be given to these regions. As an important result, the estimation of seismicity rate changes and detecting the precursory seismic quiescence can be used as an important tool in the assessment of earthquake potential.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702502
2017-11-05
2020-10-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arabasz, W.J. and Wyss, M.
    [1996] Significant precursory seismic quiescences in the extensional Wasatch front region Utah. EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un. 77, F455.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Huang, Q., Sobolev, G.A. and Nagao, T.
    [2001] Characteristics of the seismic quiescence and activation patterns before the M=7.2 Kobe earthquake, January17, 1995. Tectonophysics, 337, 99–116.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Mogi, K.
    [1962] Magnitude-frequency relation for elastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst, 40, 831–853.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Öztürk, S.
    [2015] A study on the correlations between seismotectonic b-value and Dc-value, and seismic quiescence Z-value in the Western Anatolian region of Turkey. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 108(2), 172–184.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Polat, O., Gok, E. and Yilmaz, D.
    [2008] Earthquake hazard of the Aegean Extension region (West Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 17, 593–614.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Reasenberg, P.A.
    [1985]. Second-order moment of Central California Seismicity, 1969–1982. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90(B7), 5479–5495.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saroglu, F., Emre, O. and Kuşçu, I.
    [1992] Active fault map of Turkey. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wiemer, S. and Wyss, M.
    [1994] Seismic quiescence before the Landers (M=7.5) and Big Bear (6.5) 1992 earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 900–916.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Wiemer, S.
    [2001] A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters, 72(2), 373–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wyss, M., and Habermann, R.E.
    [1988] Precursory seismic quiescence. PAGEOPH, 126, 319–332.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702502
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702502
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error