1887

Abstract

Summary

In this study, first of all Bartın Earthquake isoseismal map is digitized from its original version by using GIS. After that, Scenario earthquake intensity maps were produced by running the AFAD-RED system with Bartın Earthquake source parameters. AFAD-RED system was developed to estimate the earthquake risk all over Turkey and it can run event for post-disaster management or run scenario earthquakes for pre-disaster management. The software is working in both online and offline modes and able to automatically generate shake and risk maps.

Bartın Earthquake scenarios were run in AFAD-RED software with each attenuation relationship and thirteen different earthquake scenarios were obtained. Bartın Earthquake isoseismal map and Scenario earthquake seismic intensity maps are compared with each other. It is observed that both of the maps are compatible with each other at different rates.

the results obtained from the study will be a guide to the risk assessment analyses to be conducted in this region and the selection of an attenuation relationship that can be used in earthquake scenarios to be prepared for pre-and post-disaster damage reduction studies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702569
2017-11-05
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahamson, N.
    , Abrahamson-Silva NGA Empirical Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA. PGV, and Spectral Acceleration for periods from 0.01–10.0 seconds, Report to the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkar, S. and Z.Çağnan
    , A local ground-motion predictive model for Turkey, and its comparison with other regional and global ground-motion models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010. 100(6): p. 2978–2995.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akkar, S., M.Sandıkkaya, and J.Bommer
    , Empirical ground-motion models for point-and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2014. 12(1): p. 359–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alptekin, Ö.; Nabelek, J. L. ve Toksöz, M. N.
    1986. Source mechanism of the Bartın earthquake of September 3, 1968 in northvvestern Turkey: Evidence for active thrust faulting at the southern Black Sea margin. Tectonophysics, 122, 73–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ambraseys, N.N., K.u.Simpson, and J.J.Bommer
    , Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1996. 25(4): p. 371–400.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boore, D.M., W.B.Joyner, and T.E.Fumal
    , Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismological research letters, 1997. 68(1): p. 128–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boore, D.M. and G.M.Atkinson
    , Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthquake Spectra, 2008. 24(1): p. 99–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Abrahamson, N.A., W.J.Silva, and R.Kamai
    , Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra, 2014. 30(3): p. 1025–1055.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell, K.W. and Y.Bozorgnia
    , NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthquake Spectra, 2014. 30(3): p. 1087–1115.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chiou, B., et al.
    , Ground-motion attenuation model for small-to-moderate shallow crustal earthquakes in California and its implications on regionalization of ground-motion prediction models. Earthquake spectra, 2010. 26(4): p. 907–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ergunay, O. and Tabban, A.
    1983, lsoseismal Map of the Bartın Earthquake Based on the Official Damage Statistics of the General Directorate of Disaster Affair of the Government of Turkey. Unpublished documents and map
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GDAL-SOFTWARE-SUITE
    GDAL-SOFTWARE-SUITE. Geospatial data abstraction library. http://www.gdal.org, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gregor, N., et al.
    , Comparison of NGA-West2 GMPEs. Earthquake Spectra, 2014. 30(3): p. 1179–1197.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Idriss, I.
    , An NGA-West2 empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 2014. 30(3): p. 1155–1177.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kadirioğlu, FT., Kartal, RF., Kılıç, T., Kalafat, D., Duman, TY., Eroğlu Azak, T., Özalp, S., Emre, Ö.
    (2016). An Improved Earthquake Catalogue (M ≥ 4.0) for Turkey and Its Near Vicinity (1900–2012). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Published online 19December2016 DOI 10.1007/s10518‑016‑0064‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0064-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalkan, E. and Gülkan, P.
    (2004). “Site-Dependent Spectra Derived from Ground Motion Records in Turkey”, Earthquake Spectra, 20(4): 1111–1138
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lander, J.F.
    (Editor) 1969, Seismological Notes-September and October 1968, Seismol. Soc. Am.59, 1023–1030.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. M.Nurlu, Y.M.Fahjan, B.Eravci, M.Baykal, G.Yenilmez, D.Yalcin, K.Yanik, F. I.Kara, F.Pakdamar
    , (2014), “Rapid Estimation Of Earthquake Losses In Turkey Using AFAD-RED System”, 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, IstanbulAug. 25–29 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Sadigh, K., et al.
    , Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismological research letters, 1997. 68(1): p. 180–189.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Stover, C. W., and Coffman, J. L.
    (1993). Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (Revised). United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702569
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201702569
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error