Sensitivity Of Magnetotelluric Monitoring Data To Geothermal Fluids At Depth: Discussion From Actual Measurements And Models

References

1. Abdelfettah, Y., Sailhac, P., Schill, E., Larnier, H., Matthey, P.-D.:
   Continuous MT monitoring for small fluid injection at Rittershoffen geothermal project, northern Alsace, France, 23nd International Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, (2016), Chiang Mai, Thailand
   [Google Scholar]
2. Abdelfettah, Y., Sailhac, P., Larnier, H., Matthey, P.-D., Schill, E.:
   Continuous MT monitoring of low volume fluid injection at Rittershoffen geothermal project, northern Alsace, France, Geothermics, (2017), under review
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aizawa, K., Kanda, W., Ogawa, Y., Iguchi, M., Yokoo, A., Yakiwara, H. and Sugano, T.:
   Temporal changes in electrical resistivity at Sakurajima volcano from continuous magnetotelluric observations, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 199, (2011), 165–175.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braun, N.:
   2D- und 3D-Magnetotellurik in Soultz-sous-Forêts, zur Lokalisation geothermisch genutzter Wässer, Diplomarbeit, Mainz univ., 107 p. (2009). (In German)
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kelbert, A., Meqbel, N.M., Egbert, G.D. and Tandon, K.:
   ModEM: A modular system for inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data, Computers & Geosciences, 66, (2014), 40–53.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Larnier, H., Sailhac, P., Chambodut, A.
   , New application of wavelet in data processing: reducing impedance bias, Earth, Planets and Space, (2016), 68:70.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mackie, R.L., Madden, T.R. and Wannamaker, P.E.:
   Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using difference equations - Theory and coparisons to integral equation solutions. Geophysics, 58, (1993), 215–226. doi: 10.1190/1.1443407
   https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443407 [Google Scholar]
8. PeacockJ.R., Thiel, S., Ried, P. and Heinson, G.S.:
   Magnetotelluric monitoring of a fluid injection: Example from an enhanced geothermal system. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, (2012), L18403. doi: 10.1029/2012GL053080
   https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053080 [Google Scholar]
9. PeacockJ.R., Thiel, S., Ried, P., Heinson, G.S. and Reid, P.:
   Time-lapse magnetotelluric monitoring of an enhanced geothermal system. Geophysics, 78, (2013), B121–130. doi: 10.1190/GEO2012‑0275.1
   https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2012-0275.1 [Google Scholar]
10. MacFarlane, J., Thiel, S., Pek, J., PeacockJ.R. and Heinson, G.S.:
    Characterisation of induced fracture networks within an enhanced geothermal system using anisotropic electromagnetic modelling, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 288, (2014), 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Sailhac, P, Tartrat, T., Larnier, H., Schill, E.:
    Prelimary results of MT monitoring following a stimulation experiment at Rittershoffen in Soultz geothermal area, France. 22nd International Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, (2014), Weimar, Germany, 24–30 August.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ThielS, PeacockJR, HeinsonGS, RiedP, MesseillerM.:
    First results of monitoring fluid injection in EGS reservoirs using Magnetotellurics. Australian Geothermal Conference, (2011), Extended Abstract, pp 4.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Warden, S., Sailhac, P., Garambois, S.
    , Microseismoelectric monitoring: a new technique to monitor hydraulic stimulation processes, EAGE Fall Meeting (2017), P0907.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Wawrzyniak, P., Zlotnicki, J., Sailhac, P., and Marquis, G.:
    Resistivity variations associated with the large March 9, 1998 eruption at La Fournaise volcano inferred by continuous MT monitoring, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, (2017), under review.
    [Google Scholar]