1887

Abstract

Summary

Over the past decade, various authors have observed a dominance of dip-slip or strike-slip P-wave first motion patterns and the juxtaposition of both within the same microseismic event cloud (e.g. ; and references therein). The steeper, and sometimes near vertical, nodal plane of these dip-slip first motion patterns is often found to strike approximately parallel to the direction of maximum horizontal stress ( Fig. 1 ). Aligned strike-slip first motion patterns show a similar behavior: steeply dipping nodal planes and one of them striking parallel to the direction of maximum horizontal stress ( Fig. 2 ). Moreover, showed that both dip-slip and strike-slip events can concentrate in discrete depth intervals. One type of mechanism tends to dominate in a given reservoir, presumably reflecting different regional stress states. demonstrate that events in neighboring clusters can have opposing P and S wave polarities …

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800070
2018-03-26
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Diller, D. E., Shuck, T., and B.Fish
    (2015). “Estimation and interpretation of high-confidence microseismic source mechanisms.”The Leading Edge, 34(8), 918–920, 922–924. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34080918.1
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisner, L., and F.Staněk
    (2017). “The bedding plane slip model for microseismicity induced in shales.”SEG 2017 Workshop: Microseismic Technologies and Applications, Hefei, China, 4–6 June 2017: pp. 18-21. https://doi.org/10.1190/Microseismic2017-005
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rutledge, J. T., Downie, R. C., Maxwell, S. C., and J. E.Drew
    (2013). “Geomechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing Inferred From Composite Radiation Patterns of Microseismicity.”SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Paper 166370. https://doi.org/10.2118/166370-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rutledge, J., Yu, X., and S.Leaney
    (2015). “Microseismic shearing driven by hydraulic-fracture opening: An interpretation of source-mechanism trends.”The Leading Edge, 34(8), 926–928, 930, 932–934. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle34080926.1
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Stanek, F. and L.Eisner
    (2013). “New model explaining inverted source mechanisms of microseismic events induced by hydraulic fracturing.”SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2013: pp. 2201-2205. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0554.1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tan, Y., and T.Engelder
    (2016). “Further testing of the bedding-plane-slip model for hydraulic fracture opening using moment-tensor inversions.”GEOPHYSICS, 81(5), KS159-KS168. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0370.1
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wilson, S., and D.Diller
    (2016). “Tip-slip source mechanisms and hydraulic fracture microseismicity.”SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016: pp. 2560-2563. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13969675.1
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800070
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800070
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error