1887

Abstract

Summary

Probabilistic seismic micro-zoning of Almaty in ground accelerations was carried out with implementation of the continual approach proposed by A.S. Aleshin to account for site category effect on ground motion. The chosen approach made it possible to avoid recalculating accelerations into macro-seismic intensity and back, to avoid the traditional discrete representation of continuous parameters, and to proceed to a direct calculation of resulting accelerations on the base of seismic rigidity obtained with engineering-geological and instrumental geophysical surveys. The developed maps are at the stage of discussion and preparation for further introduction into the normative documents of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800492
2018-04-23
2020-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. АлешинА.С.
    Континуальная теория сейсмического микрорайонирования. М.:Научный мир, 2017. 302 с.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. АптикаевФ.Ф.
    Инструментальная шкала сейсмической интенсивности. М.: Наука и образование, 2012. 175 с.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ГусевА.А.
    О принципах картирования сейсмоопасных регионов Российской Федерации и нормирования сейсмических нагрузок в терминах сейсмических ускорений. http://www.emsd.ru/~gusev/2011/Gusev2011MaxUskGrunta-IngIzysk-ptI&II.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Сейсмическое микрорайонирование / под ред. С.В.Медведева. М.: Наука, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. СН РК 2.03-28-2004
    . Шкала для оценки интенсивности землетрясений MSK-64(K). Алматы, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. СП14.3330.2012
    . Строительство в сейсмических районах. М., 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. СП283.1325800.2016
    . Объекты строительные повышенной ответственности. Правила сейсмического микрорайонирования. М., 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BSEN1998-1: 2004 Eurocode 8
    . Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization. - Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council)
    . 2001: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2000 Edition, Part 1: Provisions, pre-pared by the Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Report FEMA 386), Washington, D.C.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SilachevaN.V., KulbayevaU.K., KravchenkoN.A.
    Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Kazakhstan, Geodesy and Geodynamics, v.28. 2017https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.11.002.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. AleshinA.S.
    The continual theory of seismic microzoning. M.: Nauchnyi mir, 2017. 302 p. [In Russian].
    [Google Scholar]
  12. AptikayevF.F.
    the Instrumental scale of seismic intensity. Moscow: Nauka i obrazovanie, 2012. 175p. [In Russian].
    [Google Scholar]
  13. GusevA.A.
    On the principles of mapping seismically dangerous regions of the Russian Federation and the normalization of seismic loads in terms of seismic accelerations. http://www.emsd.ru/~gusev/2011/Gusev2011MaxUskGrunta-IngIzysk-ptI&II.pdf [In Russian].
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Seismic microzoning / Ed. S.V.Medvedev. Moscow: Nauka, 1977. [In Russian].
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SNRK 2.03-28-2004
    . The scale for earthquake intensity estimation MSK-64(K). Almaty, 2004. [In Russian].
    [Google Scholar]
  16. SP14.3330.2012
    . Construction in seismic regions. M., 2012. [In Russian].
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BSEN 1998-1: 2004 Eurocode 8
    . Design of structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization. - Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council)
    . 2001: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, 2000 Edition, Part 1: Provisions, pre-pared by the Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Report FEMA 386), Washington, D.C.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. SilachevaN.V., KulbayevaU.K., KravchenkoN.A.
    Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Kazakhstan, Geodesy and Geodynamics, v.28. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.11.002.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800492
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800492
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error