Unexpected Dependence of the Late-time Transient Response on the Size and Configuration of a TEM Array

References

1. Foged, N., Auken, E., Christiansen, A.V., and Sorensen, K. I.
   , 2013, Test-site calibration and validation of airborne and ground-based TEM systems // Geophysics, VOL. 78, NO. 2, P. E95–E106.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Geidetzka, A.
   , 2002, Erste Erfahrungen mit der Nano TEM - Apparatur. Diplomarbeit. Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie: Köln.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Kozhevnikov, N.O.
   , 2009, Applying the transmission line theory to study ungrounded horizontal loop self-transients // Russian Geology and Geophysics, 50, 222–233.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kozhevnikov, N.O.
   , 2012, Testing TEM systems using a large horizontal loop conductor // Russian Geology and Geophysics, 53, 1243–1251.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Kozhevnikov, N.O., Antonov, E. Yu.
   , 2008, The magnetic relaxation effect on TEM responses of a uniform earth // Russian Geology and Geophysics, 49, 197–205.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lavoue, F., J.Van Der Kruk, J.Rings, F.Andre, D.Moghadas, J. A.Huisman, S.Lambot, L.Weihermüller, J.Vanderborght, and H.Vereecken
   , 2010, Electromagnetic induction calibration using apparent electrical conductivity modelling based on electrical resistivity tomography: Near Surface Geophysics, 8, 553–561.
   [Google Scholar]
7. M.V.Sharlov, N.O.Kozhevnikov, R.V.Sharlov
   , Lake Baikal – A Unique Site for Testing and Calibration of Near-surface TEM Systems // Near Surface Geoscience 3-7 September 2017, Malmö, Sweden. 5 pp. doi: 10.3997/2214‑4609.201702038
   https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201702038 [Google Scholar]
8. SapialV., ViezzoliA., MenghiniA., MarchettiM., ChiappiniM.
   2015. The Italian reference site for TEM methods. Annals of Geophysics, 58, 5, G0548; doi: 10.4401/ag‑6805
   https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6805 [Google Scholar]
9. Sharlov, M.V., Buddo, I.V., Misyurkeeva, N.V., Shelokhov, I.A., Agafonov, Yu.A.
   , 2017. Experience of efficient near-surface studies by the shallow TEM method using the Fastsnap system. Pribory i Sistemy Razvedochnoi Geofiziki38 (2), 8–23.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Sharlov, M.V., Buddo, I.V., Misyurkeeva, N.V., Shelokhov, I.A., Agafonov, Yu.A.
    , 2017. Transient Electromagnetic Surveys for High-Resolution Near-Surface Exploration: Basics and Case Studies. FirstBreak, Vol. 35, September 2017, 63–71.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Vishnyakov, A.E., Vishnyakova, K.A.
    , 1974, Excitation and measurement of electric and magnetic fields in EM prospection methods. Nedra, Moscow.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Zakharkin, A.K.
    , 1981, Manual on TEM surveys with the TSIKL instrument. SNIIGGiMS, Novosibirsk.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Zakharkin, A.K., Tarlo, N.N.
    , 1999, Metrological support of TEM measurements // Geofizka, N6, 34–39.
    [Google Scholar]
14. ZongyangShi, LihuaLiu, PanXiao, ZhiGeng, FuboLiu, and GuangyouFang
    , 2016, Simulation and Analysis of the effect of ungrounded rectangular loop distributed parameters on TEM response. Journal of Applied Geophysics. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.12.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.12.018 [Google Scholar]