We present results from a triple-source signal apparition-style field test carried out over a PRM array in the North Sea during the summer of 2017. In addition to the triple-source line, two reference lines were acquired firing the central source only.

Assessing the quality of acoustic and elastic P/Z combination confirms high fidelity data quality throughout the bandwidth of the data. Comparing prestack migrated images of elastic P/Z combination against Amundsen demultiple images shows that multiples are a significant challenge in the area and that removing all surface related multiples as done in the Amundsen demultiple method is critical for unambiguous interpretation.

Amundsen demultiple requires the deconvolution of the downgoing wavefield from the upgoing wavefield. Thus, the process relies on excellent data fidelity in separated wavefield constituents. We find that comparisons of reference line on reference line display a similar level of residual as the reference line compared to the isolated source result corresponding to the same source location. The reference line compared to the decoded source result corresponding to the other offset source locations display a larger residual. Our results thus confirm that triple-source signal apparition-style acquisition enables highly productive acquisition of seismic data without compromising on data quality.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Amundsen, L.
    [2001] Elimination of free-surface related multiples without need of the source wavelet. Geophysics, 66, 327–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson, F., van Manen, D. J., Wittsten, J., Eggenberger, K., Robertsson, J. O. A.
    [2017a] Quaternion dealising for simultaneous source separation. SEG Annual Meeting, 4322–4327.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson, F., Robertsson, J. O. A., van Manen, D. J., Wittsten, J., Eggenberger, K., Amundsen, L.
    [2017b] Express Letters: Flawless diamond separation in simultaneous source acquisition by seismic apparition. Geophys. J. Int., 209, 1735–1739.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Eggenberger, K., Robertsson, J. O. A., Andersson, F., van Manen, D. J., Pedersen, Å. S., Amundsen, L., Thompson, M., Solheim, O. A.
    [2017] Signal apparition enabled parallel source acquisition of 4D-grade seismic data: Results from a field test in the North Sea. SEG Annual Meeting, xxx-xxx.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elde, R. M., Roy, S. S., Andersen, C. F. and Andersen, T.
    [2016]. Grane permanent reservoir monitoring – meeting expectations!78th Conference & Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Osen, A., Amundsen, L., Reitan, A.
    [1999] Removal of water-layer multiples from multicomponent sea-bottom data. Geophysics, 64, 838–851.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Robertsson, J. O. A., Amundsen, L., and Pedersen, Å. S.
    [2016] Express Letter: Signal apparition for simultaneous source wavefield separation. Geophys. J. Int., 206, 1301–1305.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson, M., Pedersen, Å. S., Andersen, M. and Skogland, S. M.
    [2016]. A novel approach for cost effective PRM seismic operations at Snorre. 78th Conference & Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error