1887

Abstract

Summary

In this paper we show that specular imaging in the dip-angle domain significantly reduces 4D imaging noise. Specular imaging limits the migration aperture to rays obeying Snell’s law. Since it is based on improved image formation, specular imaging is superior to signal processing methods applied to a noisy image. In the context of 4D, the improved imaging can prove useful in simplifying, and therefore speeding up, the 4D processing. By better imaging the data, based on a physical principle, we can avoid extraneous signal processing, such as dip-filtering, and thereby avoid signal damage and additional processing time. Separating the seismic energy at the imaging stage into specular and non-specular components in the dip-angle domain additionally provides the opportunity to identify diffraction energy. The particular behaviour of diffracted energy in the dip-angle domain, i.e. creating flat events across the whole dip-angle range, makes them separable from both specular energy and migration artefacts. We present the performance of the proposed specular imaging approach on a 4D dataset from the Caspian Sea. Significant uplift is obtained not only on the 4D image, but also on the 3D pre-stack gathers leading to improved AVO.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800696
2018-06-11
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Audebert, F., Froidevaux, P., Rakotoarisoa, H. and Svay-Lucas, J.
    [2002]. Insights into migration in the angle domain. 72nd SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Schleicher, J., Hubral.P., Tygel, M. and Jaya, M.S.
    [1997]. Minimum apertures and Fresnel zones in migration and demigration. Geophysics, 62, 183–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Haacke, R., Casasanta, L., Hou, S. and Henderson, J.R.
    [2017]. Dip-angle image filtering for 4D processing of towed-streamer and OBN datasets. First EAGE Workshop on PRM, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hertweck, T., Jager, C., Goertz, A., and Schleicher, J.
    [2003]. Aperture effects in 2.5D Kirchhoff migration: a geometrical explanation. Geophysics, 68, 1673–1684.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Qin, F., Wang, B., Zhang, P. and Audebert, F.
    [2005]. Kirchhoff PreSDM interactive dip-gather stacking and dip illumination panel generation. 78th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sun, J.
    [1998]. On the limited aperture migration in two dimensions. Geophysics, 63, 984–994.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Skinner, M. et al.
    [2015]. Improved 4D Data Quality Offshore Angola in a Mature 4D Multi Monitor Context. 85th SEG Annual International Meeting, Expanded Abstracts.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zavalishin, B.
    [1982]. Diffractions over deposit edges, SEP report SEP-32.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800696
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800696
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error