1887

Abstract

Summary

High resolution, low noise time strain estimates are derived through a deliberate choice of penalty function in the time shift inversion. In seismic time lapse analysis, time shifts and their derivative time strain has the potential to directly pin-point transit time changes inside the producing reservoir. But time strains are noise prone, and it has proved challenging to produce high resolution, low noise time strain estimates. The high resolution character of the method presented here is demonstrated at a single trace extracted from a base line survey and compared against two monitor survey traces. Widely used smoothness penalty functions typically succeed in estimating absolute time shifts, but fail to deliver high resolution time strains; this paper shows that this can be achieved by adapting an appropriate penalty function. The resolution of the method presented here is comparable to the resolution achieved through 4D AVO inversion, as demonstrated on a 2D line. This gives promise that a joint inversion of time shifts and amplitude changes leading to improved constraints in time lapse inversion can be established.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800700
2018-06-11
2019-12-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ball, V., Tenorio, L., Schiott, C., Blangy, J.P., Thomas, M.
    [2015] Uncertainty in inverted elastic properties resulting from uncertainty in the low-frequency model, The Leading Edge, 34(9), 1028–1030, 1032, 1034–1035.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Griffiths, L., Blanchard, T.D., Edgar, J.A., ShahraeeniM.S.
    [2015] Trace Warping vs. Impedance Warping in 4D Seismic Inversion, 77th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, We P3 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hale, D.
    [2013] Dynamic warping of seismic images, Geophysics, 78(2), sl05–sll5.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hatchell, P., Bourne, S.
    [2005] Rocks under strain: Strain-induced time-lapse time shifts are observed for depleting reservoirs, The Leading Edge, 24(12), 1222–1225.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Landre, M., Stammeijer, J.
    [2004] Quantitative estimation of compaction and velocity changes using 4D impedance and traveltime changes, Geophysics, 69(4), 949–957.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Y., Landre, M., Arntsen, B., Joost, v.d. N., Wapenaar, K.
    [2017] A new approach to separate seismic time-lapse time shifts in the reservoir and overburden, Geophysics, 82(6), q67–q78,
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Naeini, E.Z., Hoeber, H., Poole, G., Siahkoohi, H.R.
    [2009] Simultaneous multivintage time-shift estimation, Geophysics, 74(5), vl09–vl21,
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nickel, M. & Sønneland, L.
    [1999] Non-rigid matching of migrated time-lapse seismic. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 872–875.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rickett, J.E., Duranti, L., Hudson, T., Regel, B., Hodgson, N.
    [2007] 4D Time Strain and the Seismic Signature of Geomechanical Compaction at Genesis, 69th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, A027.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Whitcombe, D.N., Paramo, P., Philip, N., Toomey, A., Redshaw, T., Linn, S.
    [2010] The Correlated Leakage Method - It’s Application to Better Quantify Timing Shifts on 4D Data, 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, B037.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800700
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800700
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error