1887

Abstract

Summary

Physical and economical constraints cause seismic data to suffer from the incompleteness on regular acquisition grids. The objective of this work is to explore the capabilities of Artificial Neural Networks to recover 3D seismic data where values are missing. The results indicate that it is possible to recover seismic data having only 20% of the measurements. The best reconstruction is achieved with a deep auto-encoder. The artificial neural network was trained and tested on 3D data patches extracted from the initial data cube. Significant improvement in the quality was gained while combining predictions for a single missing value from multiple overlapping patches. Computational speed is increased while exploiting high performance software i.e. OpenMP on multi-core CPU. To the best of our knowledge this is the first successful attempt to recover seismic signal with artificial neural networks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800918
2018-06-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alain, G. and Bengio, Y.
    [2014] What Regularized Auto-Encoders Learn from the Data Generating Distribution. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 3563–3593.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y. and Courville, A.
    [2016] Deep Learning. Book in preparation for MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Herrmann, F., Wason, H. and Lin, T.
    [2011] Compressive sensing in seismic exploration: an outlook on a new paradigm. Recorder, 36.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Mousavi, A., Patel, A. and Baraniuk, R.
    [2015] A Deep Learning Approach to Structured Signal Recovery. CoRR, abs/1508.04065.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pilikos, G. and Faul, A.
    [2017] Bayesian feature learning for seismic compressive sensing and denoising. Geophysics, 82, 1–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Poulton, M.
    [2001] Computational Neural Networks for Geophysical Data Processing. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Qian, F., Yin, M., Su, M., Wang, Y. and Hu, G.
    [2017] Seismic facies recognition based on prestack data using deep convolutional autoencoder. CoRR, abs/1704.02446.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ray, A. and Nurul, K.
    [2006] 3D interpolation of irregular data with a POCS algorithm. Geophysics, 71(6), E91–E97.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Trad, D.
    [2009] Five-dimensional interpolation: Recovering from acquisition constraints. Geophysics, 74(6), 123–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wiki, S.
    [2017] Open data. Accessed: 2017-05-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, L. and Mou, X.
    [2011] FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment. IEEE: Transactions on image processing, 20.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800918
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201800918
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error