1887

Abstract

Summary

The variability of minerals’ elastic moduli for non-clay and clay volume fractions of shaley sands is overlooked in the literature. This has implication in proper use of Gassmann fluid substitution model in sandstones. Here, I argue that the elastic moduli of the dry frame at zero porosity is not equivalent to effective elastic moduli of the rock aggregate and the latter should not be used as the effective minerals’ elastic moduli in Gassmann model. A calibration algorithm is proposed here to address this challenge by assessing several combinations of elastic moduli of the solid minerals (sand and wet-clay) through fitting the wireline log velocities. While there is a wealth of literature on the effects of clay on velocities, the treatment of clay content in the dry rock models is discussed to a lesser extent. The proposed method, also addresses this challenge by extending the application of the existing dry-rock models to sand-shale mixtures. This allows us to devise an explicit relation between dry-frame elastic moduli and effective porosity and clay content. Such model is necessary for simulator-to-seismic modelling studies where the reservoir model include reservoir and non-reservoir lithologies with a variable porosity and clay content.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801019
2018-06-11
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amini, H., & Alvarez, E.
    (2014). Calibration of the petro-elastic model for 4D seismic studies in multi-mineral rocks. EAGE/FESM Joint Regional Conference Petrophysics Meets Geoscience, Malaysia
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Blangy, J.P., Strandenes, S., Moos, D. and Nur, D.
    , (1993). Ultrasonic velocities in sands-revisited. GEOPHYSICS, 58(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng, C. H., & Toksöz, M. N.
    (1979). Inversion of seismic velocities for the pore aspect ratio spectrum of a rock. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B13), 7533–7543.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Durrani, M.Z.A., Willson, K., Chen, J., Tapp, B. and Akram, J.
    (2014), Rational rock physics for improved velocity prediction and reservoir properties estimation for granite wash (tight sands) in Anadarko Basin, Texas, Int. J. Geophys.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberg, I., and Gurevich, B.
    , (1998). A semi-empirical velocity-porosity-clay model for petrophysical interpretation of P- and S-velocities: Geophys. Prosp., 46, 271–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Izumotani, S. and Onozuka, S.
    (2013). Elastic moduli and the aspect ratio spectrum of rock using simulated annealing. Geophysical Prospecting, 61: 489–504.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., & Dvorkin, J.
    (2009). The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Peng, D., Yin, C., Zhao, H., & Liu, W.
    (2016). An estimation method of pore structure and mineral moduli based on Kuster-Toksöz (KT) Model and Biot’s coefficient. Acta Geophysica, 64(6).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. SimmR.
    2007. Practical Gassmann fluid substitution in sand/shale sequences. First Break25, 61–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. SmithT.M., SondergeldC.H. and Rai, CS.
    (2003). Gassmann fluid substitutions: A tutorial. GEOPHYSICS, 68(2), 430–440
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SmithT.M.
    (2011). Practical seismic petrophysics: The effective use of log data for seismic analysis. The Leading Edge, 30.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Vernik, L. and Kachanov, M.
    (2010). Modeling elastic properties of siliciclastic rocks. GEOPHYSICS, 75(6), E171–E182.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2012). On some controversial issues in rock physics. The Leading Edge; 31 (6): 636–642.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, J. J., and Bentley, L. R.
    (2003). Pore geometry and elastic moduli in sandstone. CREWES Research Rep., 15, 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, J. J.
    (2001). Time lapse seismic surveys: The rock physics basis. MSc Thesis, CREWES.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801019
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error