3D Seismic Forward Modeling from the Multi-Physical Reservoir Model at the Ketzin CO2 Storage Site

References

1. BatzleM. and Wang, Z.
   [1992] Seismic properties of pore fluids. Geophysics, 57(11), 1396–1408.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Förster, A., Norden, B., Zinck-Jrgensen, K., Frykman, P., Kulenkampff, J., Spangenberg, E., Erzinger, J., Zimmer, M., Kopp, J. and Borm, G.
   [2006] Baseline characterization of the CO2SINK geological storage site at Ketzin, Germany. Environmental Geosciences, 13(3), 145–161.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Giese, R., Henninges, J., Lüth, S., Morozova, D., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Würdemann, H., Zimmer, M., Cosma, C., Juhlin, C. and Group, C.S.
   [2009] Monitoring at the CO2 SINK site: A concept integrating geophysics, geochemistry and microbiology. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 2251–2259.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Global CCS Institute
   Global CCS Institute [2015] The Global Status of CCS: 2015, Summary Report.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Huang, F., Bergmann, P., Juhlin, C., Ivandic, M., Lüth, S., Ivanova, A., Kempka, T., Henninges, J., Sopher, D. and Zhang, F.
   [2018] The first post-injection seismic monitor survey at the Ketzin pilot CO2 storage site: results from time-lapse analysis. Geophysical Prospecting, 66(1), 62–84.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Huang, F., Juhlin, C., Kempka, T., Norden, B. and Zhang, F.
   [2015] Modeling 3D time-lapse seismic response induced by CO2 by integrating borehole and 3D seismic data-A case study at the Ketzin pilot site, Germany. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 36, 66–77.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Ivandic, M., Juhlin, C., Lueth, S., Bergmann, P., Kashubin, A., Sopher, D., Ivanova, A., Baumann, G. and Henninges, J.
   [2015] Geophysical monitoring at the Ketzin pilot site for CO2 storage: new insights into the plume evolution. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 32, 90–105.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ivanova, A., Kashubin, A., Juhojuntti, N., Kummerow, J., Henninges, J., Juhlin, C., Lüth, S. and Ivandic, M.
   [2012] Monitoring and volumetric estimation of injected CO2 using 4D seismic, petrophysical data, core measurements and well logging: a case study at Ketzin, Germany. Geophysical Prospecting, 60(5), 957–973.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Juhlin, C., Giese, R., Zinck-Jorgensen, K., Cosma, C., Kazemeini, H., Juhojuntti, N., Lüth, S., Norden, B. and Förster, A.
   [2007] 3D baseline seismics at Ketzin, Germany: The CO2 SINK project. Geophysics, 72(5), B121–B132.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lüth, S., Ivanova, A. and Kempka, T.
    [2015] Conformity assessment of monitoring and simulation of CO2 storage: A case study from the Ketzin pilot site. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 42, 329–339.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Martens, S., Liebscher, A., Möller, F., Henninges, J., Kempka, T., Lüth, S., Norden, B., Prevedel, B., Szizybalski, A. and Zimmer, M.
    [2013] CO2 storage at the Ketzin pilot site, Germany: fourth year of injection, monitoring, modelling and verification. Energy Procedia, 37, 6434–6443.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Martens, S., Liebscher, A., Möller, F., Wurdemann, H., Schilling, F., Kuhn, M. and Group, K.
    [2011] Progress report on the first European on-shore CO2 storage site at Ketzin (Germany)—Second year of injection. Energy Procedia, 4, 3246–3253.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Wiese, B.U., Wagner, F.M., Norden, B. and Schmidt-Hattenberger, C.
    [2017] Fully Coupled Hydrogeophysical Inversion of Hydraulics, Gas Pressure and Geoelectrics. Energy Procedia, 114, 3588–3596.
    [Google Scholar]