Frequency decomposition provides good structural understanding, but do not resolve fluids accumulations. Amplitudes of seismic wave passing through rocks with reservoirs are damped more, especially at high frequencies. Therefore, frequency decomposition, which takes into account dumping factor (Q) helps to identify reservoirs. The Prony method decomposes seismic signals by damping cosines at short-time intervals, and creates discrete spectrum including values of amplitude, dumping factor, frequency and phase. We first show the advantage of using Prony method for seismic reservoir interpretation by analysing the frequency decomposed seismic sections and the expressed Q-factor component. Then we compare the interpretation results of Prony’s method with Quantitative Interpretation and Phase Decomposition technique. We show that the Prony Decomposition is a convenient scanning tool for geo exploration.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aki, K. and Chouet, B.
    [1975] Origin of coda waves: source, attenuation, and scattering effects. Journal of Geophysical Research, 80, 3322–3342.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Carriere, R. and Moses, R. L.
    [1989] High Resolution Radar Target Modeling Using ARMA Models. The Ohio State University. Technical Report 718048–11 Contract No. N0014-89-K-0202.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Castagna, J., Oyem, A., Portniaguine, O. and Aikulola, U.
    [2016] Phase decomposition. Interpretation, 4(3), SN1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fomel, S.
    [2013] Seismic data decomposition into spectral. Geophysics, 76, 069–076.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Prony, G.R.B.
    [1795] Essai experimental et analitique. Paris. J. l’Ecole Polytech, 1, 24–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hauer, J.F., Demeure, C.J. and Scharf, L.L.
    [1990] Initial results in Prony analysis of Power System response signals. IEEE Transactions on Power System, 5(1), 80–89.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Helle, H.B. and Inderhaug, O.H
    , [1993] Complex seismic decomposition — application to pore pressure prediction. Extended Abstract of Papers, EAGE 55th Conference & Exhibition, Stavanger, 132–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Knopoff, L.
    [1964] Q. Reviews of Geophysics, 2(4), 625–660.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mitrofanov, G. and Priimenko, V.
    [2013] Prony filtration of seismic data: mathematical and physical modelling. Revista Brasileira de Geofisica31, 151–168.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error