1887

Abstract

Summary

Subsurface offset extended imaging provides a possible link connecting migrated reflections in CIGs with the migration velocity error. However, it describes an artificial scattering geometry that splits the reflection point between incident and scattered waves. The split configuration contradicts basic principles of continuum mechanics, as it represents action-at-a-distance, and has kinematics distinct from those of ordinary physical reflection. The angle-domain image, computed as a Radon transform of the subsurface offset image, implicitly inherits the split configuration and distinguished by its response to erroneous migration velocity. Conventional traveltime inversion techniques, applied for velocity optimization, are incompatible with the split configuration. Hence, they are most likely to fail while inverting traveltimes from the subsurface offset image or its angle-domain transformation. Nevertheless, those images that are being identified with the split geometry still carry valuable information about the migration velocity error. They should be input to traveltime inversion algorithms only after a proper generalization. We present a modified traveltime inversion formulation, appropriate for split reflections in the image space. The net result is a generalized reflection tomography scheme where the traveltime estimation accounts for a possible subsurface offset split.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801382
2018-06-11
2020-07-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Claerbout, J.F.
    [1985]. Imaging the Earth’s interior. Blackwell Scientific Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dafni, R. and Symes, W.W.
    [2016a]. Scattering and dip angle decomposition in relation with subsurface offset extended wave-equation migration. Geophysics, 81 (3), S119–S138.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. [2017]. Kinematics of reflections in subsurface offset and angle-domain image gathers. 87th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 4594–4598.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Farra, V. and Madariaga, R.
    [1988]. Nonlinear reflection tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 95, 135–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kosloff, D., Sherwood, J., Koren, Z., Machet, E. and Falkovitz, Y.
    [1996]. Velocity and interface depth determination by tomography of depth migrated gathers. Geophysics, 61 (5), 1511–1523.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Montel, J. -P. and Lambaré, G.
    [2013]. Wave equation angle domain common image gather asymptotic analysis. 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3757–3761.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Stolk, C. C., de Hoop, M. V. and Symes, W. W.
    [2009]. Kinematics of shot-geophone migration. Geophysics, 74 (6), WCA19–WCA34.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stork, C.
    [1992]. Reflection tomography in the postmigrated domain. Geophysics, 57 (6), 680–692.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801382
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801382
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error