1887

Abstract

Summary

Sharp velocity contrasts in the overburden may cause problems for seismic imaging of deeper targets. Pre-stack depth migration in combination with traveltime tomography to build the velocity model is generally considered as a solution to the problem. However, building the velocity model with sufficient lateral and vertical resolution near discontinuities is difficult and imperfect velocity models will result in imperfect seismic images. Forward modelling seismic data followed by PSDM is a way to investigate and quantify sensitivity to imperfections in the velocity model. Kirchhoff modelling offers an efficient alternative to full-wavefield modelling; it is based on advanced ray tracing and can model diffractions, but is still computationally quick. In this study Kirchhoff pre-stack modelling provides a means for testing the impact of velocity errors on the final seismic image: Kirchoff modelling is followed by Kirchhoff target migration with the model velocity field and with degraded velocity fields. Results reveal the scale of potential imaging errors under a shallow velocity discontinuity at the Golden Eagle field in the North Sea. Results show that the danger of creating false structure due to image distortion is low, but that vertical positioning due to inaccurate velocity models carries a higher risk.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801446
2018-06-11
2020-05-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Birdus, S.
    [2007] Removing fault shadow distortions by fault constrained tomography. 77th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Extended Abstracts, 3039–3043.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Fagin, S.
    [1996] The fault shadow problem: Its nature and elimination. The Leading Edge, 17, 1005–1013.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gjøystdal, H., Iversen, E., Lecomte, I., Kaschwich, T., Drottning, Å. and Mispel, J.
    [2007] Improved applicability of ray tracing in seismic acquisition, imaging, and interpretation. Geophysics, 72, 261–271.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gochioco, L.M., Novianti, I.R. and Pascual, R.V.
    [2002] Resolving fault shadow problems in Irian Jaya (Indonesia) using prestack depth migration. The Leading Edge, 21, 911–912.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones, I.F.
    [2013] Tutorial: the seismic response to strong vertical velocity change. First Break, 31(6), 79–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Pinnock, S. J. and Dutton, D.
    [in press] The Golden Eagle Area Development, Blocks 14/26a and 20/01, UK North Sea. In: United Kingdom Oil and Gas Field (third edition). Gluyas, J. and Goffey, G. (main editors). (London: The Geological Society of London).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Quigley, D., Lau, A., Stewart, K., Yin, C., Mann, A. and Fitzpatrick, A.
    [2012] Benefits of constraints for velocity modeling a fault shadow: A case study. 82nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Extended Abstracts, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Tucker, P.M. and Yorston, H.J.
    [1971] Pitfalls in seismic interpretation. 41st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Extended Abstracts, 67–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vinje, V., Iversen, E. and Gjøystdal, H.
    [1993] Traveltime and amplitude estimation using wavefront construction. Geophysics, 58, 1157–1166.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801446
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801446
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error