1887

Abstract

Summary

Combined rock mechanical and flow tests were conducted on a preserved, partly calcite-cemented natural fracture of a fractured chalk reservoir at in-situ stress and pressure conditions. Stress and pressure changes expected during reservoir production were simulated. A special extensometer setup was applied for improved data quality. Fracture normal stiffness values of 200 MPa/mm were measured at initial in-situ conditions and its stress-dependency can be described with a hyperbolical model. Changes in stress and pore pressure had an equal effect on fracture normal displacement.

Fracture permeability is 6 orders of magnitude larger than the chalk matrix. It is weakly stress-dependent for pore pressure changes present during hydrocarbon extraction following a linear trend. The fracture underwent damage when effective stresses were increased to levels beyond the expected conditions during field production. The nonlinear hydraulic conductivity reduction follows a power-law relationship.

The ratio between hydraulic and mechanical aperture change was constant at 0.2 for stress changes experienced during depletion. It increased to about 0.5 after applying high effective normal stresses that altered the fracture surface. Those findings are qualitatively in line with observations reported from other naturally or artificially fractured rocks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801489
2018-06-11
2020-07-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bandis, S.C., Lumsden, A.C. and Barton, N.R.
    [1983] Fundamentals of Rock Joint Deformation, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 20(6), 249–268.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Dudley, J., Brignoli, M., Crawford, B., Ewy, R., Love, D., McLennan, J., Ramos, G., Shafer, J., Sharf-Aldin, M., Siebrits, E., Boyer, J. and Chertov, M.
    [2016] ISRM suggested method for uniaxial-strain compressibility testing for reservoir geomechanics, Rock Mech Rock Eng, 49, 4153–4178.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gale, J. E.
    [1982] The effects of fracture type (induced-versus natural on the stress-fracture closure-fracture permeability relationships. Proc. 23rd U.S. Symp. on Rock Mechanics, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, 290–298.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nelson, R.A.
    [2001] Geological Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, 2nd edn. Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, TX.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Renshaw, C.E.
    [1995] On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in roughwalled fractures. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B12), 24629–24636.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rozhko, A.Y., Naumann, M., Wennberg, O.P. and Jonoud, S.
    Submitted. Modelling two-phase fluid flow in a natural fracture in chalk under different stress. Extended abstract submitted to EAGE 80th Annual Conference & Exhibition2018, 11–14 JuneCopenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wennberg, O.P., Graham Wall, B., Sæther, E., Jonoud, S., Rozhko, A.Y, and Naumann, M.
    Submitted. Fractures in chalks and marls of the Shetland Group in the Gullfaks Field, North Sea. Extended abstract submitted to EAGE 80th Annual Conference & Exhibition2018, 11–14 JuneCopenhagen, Denmark.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801489
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801489
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error