1887

Abstract

Summary

In passive monitoring of microseismicity, full-wavefield imaging offers a robust approach for the estimation of source location and subsurface properties. With multicomponent data and the 3D elastic wave equation, the coexistence of P- and S-modes at the source location in time-reversal wavefield extrapolation allows the development of imaging conditions that identify the source position based on migration principles. The correlation between decomposed P- and S-wavefields is the most common imaging condition used in passive elastic wavefield imaging. However, the PS imaging condition produces a nodal plane at the source location and requires Helmholtz decomposition, which is not feasible for anisotropic media. We propose an imaging condition for passive wavefield imaging that is based on energy conservation of the elastic wave equation. Our imaging condition also compares the different modes present in the displacement field, but produces a strong and focused correlation at the source location without wave-mode decomposition at each time step. Numerical 3D synthetic experiments demonstrate the advantages of the proposed imaging condition (compared to PS correlation with decomposed wave modes), its sensitivity with respect to velocity inaccuracy, its quality and efficacy in estimating the source location.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801579
2018-06-11
2020-08-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aminzadeh, F., Burkhard, N., Nicoletis, L., Rocca, F. and Wyatt, K.
    [1994] SEG/EAEG 3-D modeling project: 2nd update. The Leading Edge, 13(9), 949–952.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Artman, B., Podladtchikov, I. and Witten, B.
    [2010] Source location using time-reverse imaging. Geophysical Prospecting, 58(1), 861–873.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dellinger, J. and Etgen, J.
    [1990] Wave-field separation in two-dimensional anisotropic media. Geophysics, 55(7), 914–919.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Grechka, V. and Heigl, W.
    [2017] Microseismic Monitoring. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kao, H. and Shan, S.
    [2004] The source-scanning algorithm: Mapping the distribution of seismic sources in time and space. Geophysical Journal International, 157, 589–594.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rocha, D., Tanushev, N. and Sava, P.
    [2017] Anisotropic elastic wavefield imaging using the energy norm. Geophysics, 82, S225–S234.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Witten, B. and Shragge, J.
    [2015] Extended wave-equation imaging conditions for passive seismic data. Geophysics, 80(6), WC61–WC72.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [2017] Image-domain velocity inversion and event location for microseismic monitoring. Geophysics, 82(5), KS71–KS83.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801579
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801579
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error