1887

Abstract

Summary

In this paper, Extended Elastic Impedance (EEI) analysis was proposed for extracting geomechanical parameters from seismic data. In order to evaluate capabilities of this method for obtaining geomechanical parameters, a shale-carbonate reservoir in south-west of Iran was studied as a case study. Petrophysical data and core analysis were used to estimate dynamic and static moduli of the reservoir rock followed by calculating the corresponding EEI spectra to a range of incident angles to select the angles of maximum correlation for different geomechanical parameters. Then, placing together two seismic attributes, namely Intercept (A) and Gradient (B), a 3D reflectivity pattern of EEI was generated at any desired angle. Finally, upon performing model-based inversion on the obtained EEI reflectivity pattern, we came with cubes of geomechanical parameters. A comparison between measured data and the corresponding EEI inversion results confirmed that, prestack seismic data can be adequately used to estimate geomechanical parameters across the entire body of reservoir. Results of this research showed that, EEI analysis can upgrade seismic geomechanics to a higher level where a 3D cube of any rock mechanical parameter can be extracted from seismic data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801613
2018-06-11
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Herwanger, J. and Koutsabeloulis, N.
    [2011] Seismic Geomechanics: How to Build and Calibrate Geomechanical Models using 3D and 4D Seismic Data, EAGE Publications. PP. 181.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mirzakhanian, M., Sharifi, J., Sokooti, M.R. and Mondol, N.H.
    [2017] Sensitivity analysis of multi-angle extended elastic impedance (MEEI) to fluid content: A carbonate reservoir case study from an Iranian Oil field, The 3th Seminar Petroleum Geophysical Exploration. Tehran, Iran.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Russell, B.H., Hedlin, K., Hilterman, F.J. and Lines, L.R.
    [2003] Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: A Biot-Gassmann perspective. Geophysics, 68(1), 29–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Sharifi, J., Mirzakhanian, M., Javaherian, A., Saberi, M.R. and Hafezi Moqadas, N.
    [2017a], An investigation on the relationship between static and dynamic bulk modulus on an Iranian oilfield, 79th EAGE Conference & Exhibition. Paris, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sharifi, J., Mirzakhanian, M., Mondol, N.H. and Saberi, M.R
    [2017b] Proposed relationships between dynamic and static Young modulus of a weak carbonate reservoir using laboratory tests, 4th International Workshop on Rock Physics. Trondheim, Norway.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Whitcombe, D.N.
    [2002] Short Note: Elastic impedance normalization. Geophysics, 67, 60–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zoback, M.
    [2007] Reservoir Geomechanics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801613
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801613
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error