1887

Abstract

Summary

Tracers have not been utilized to their full potential due to their shortcomings (i. detection and recovery, and cost. Recently, there has been less emphasis on the study of tracers in terms of fluid flow in porous media. The science of fluid flow in terms of dispersion and permeability has not been focused to its full extent in the past decade.

This paper provides a novel perspective in the study of dispersion by observing velocity data as an indication of rock permeability, and presents experimental results and for tracer fluid flow in carbonate rocks. The analysis and interpretation is based on an experimental approach (setup, procedure and measurement), and mathematical analysis.

To gain a new perspective of studying the permeability and dispersion correlation, several chemical tracers are injected into three different carbonate core samples in a laboratory experiment. In this core flood experiment fluid is injected at different rates and is used to experimentally measure the dispersion coefficient at several given velocities.

Using the mathematical model permeability is determined and used in simulation to dynamically model the heterogeneity of the reservoir. The conclusion on estimating permeability from tracer expereiment.serve as input to simulation models, to enhancing characterization of reservoir.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801633
2018-06-11
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. R. J.Blackwell
    , “Laboratory Studies of Microscopic Dispersion Phenomena”, SPE (1962).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. T. K.Perkins, O. C.Johnston
    , “A Review of Diffusion and Dispersion in Porous Media”, SPE (1963).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Maghsood Abbaszadeh – Dehghani & W. E.Brigham
    , “Analysis of unit mobility ratio well to well tracer flow to determined reservoir heterogeneity”, Stanford University Petroleum Reseach Institute (1982). [3]. Maghsood Abbaszadeh – Dehghani & W. E. Brigham, “Analysis of unit mobility ratio well to well tracer flow to determined reservoir heterogeneity”, Stanford University Petroleum Reseach Institute (1982).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Olaoluwa O.Adepoju & Larry W.Lake & Russell T.Johns
    , “Anisotropic Dispersion and Upscaling Miscible Displacement”, SPE (2015).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ClaireWelty & Lynn W.Gelhar
    , “Evaluation of longitudinal dispersivity from nonuniform flow tracer tests”, Journal of Hydrology (1994).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson
    Anderson, “Movement of contaminants in Groundwater: Groundwater Transport – Advection and Dispersion. Groundwater Contamination”, DC: National Academy Press (1984).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lynn W.Gelhar, ClaireWelty & Kenneth R.Rehfeldt
    , “A Critical Review of Data on Field-Scale Dispersion in Aquifers”, Water Resources Research (1992), Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 1955–1974.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. H.Li
    , “Effective porosity and longitudinal dispersivity of sedimentary rocks determined by laboratory and field tracer test”, Environmental Geology Journal (1995).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DirkSchulze-Makuch
    , “Longitudinal Dispersivity Data and Implications for Scaling Behavior”, National Ground Water Association (2003), Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 443–456.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. DonaldE. Menzie
    , “Dispersivity as an oil reservoir rock characteristic”, M.S. Thesis, University of Oklahoma (1988).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. S.Dutta
    , “Dispersivity as an Oil Reservoir Rock Property
    [Google Scholar]
  12. M.Greaves, K. M.Patel
    , “Surfactant Dispersion in Porous Media. Enhanced Oil Recovery”, Eddition Technip (1982).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jui-ShengChen, Chen-WuingLiu, Ching-PingLiang
    , “Evaluation of longitudinal and transvers dispersivities/distance ratios for tracer test in a radially convergent flow field with scale-dependent dispersion”, Advances in Water Resources (2006), Vol. 29, pp 887–898.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. T. J.Poulin
    , “The Determination of the Coefficient of Dispersion in Sandstones”,M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Okla. (1985).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. C. ErinFeehleyand ChunmiaoZheng & Fred J.Molz
    , “A dual-domain mass transfer approach for modeling solute transport in heterogeneousaquifers: Application to the Macrodispersion Experiment (MADE) site”, Water Resources Research (2000).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. S.Brouyere & A.Dassargues & R.Therrein
    , “Modelling of dual porosity media: comparision of different techniques and evaluation of the impact on plume transport simulator”, National Fund of Scientific Research (2000).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. W. J.Bond & P. J.Wierenga
    , “Immobile Water During Solute Transport in Unsaturated Sand Columns”, Water Resources Research (1990).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801633
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201801633
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error