Магнитовариационные исследования Ладожской аномалии электропроводности: от открытия в 70-х, до представлений о ее пространственном положении и глубинной структуре по материалам новейших наблюдений

References

1. Zhamaletdinov, A.A., and Kulik, S.N.
   , (2012). The largest anomalies in the electrical conductivity of the world // Geophysical Journal. Vol.. 34, No. 4. P. 22–39 (in Russian).
   [Google Scholar]
2. SchmuckerU.
   , (1970), Anomalies of geomagnetic variations in the SW United States, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
   [Google Scholar]
3. RokityanskyI.I.
   , (1982) Geoelectromagnetic investigations of the Earth’s crust and mantleShpringer. Berlin. P. 381.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berdichevsky, M.N., and Dmitriev, V.I.
   , (2009) Models and methods of magnetotellurics. Springer. Berlin. 680 p.
   [Google Scholar]
5. RokityanskyI.I., KulikS.N., RokityanskayaD.A.
   (1981) Ladoga anomaly of electrical conductivity. Geofiz. Journal. Ukrainian Academy of Sciences. 1981. Volume 3. №2. Pp. 97–99.
   [Google Scholar]
6. KovtunA.A., VardanyantsI.L., LegenkovaN.P., SmirnovM.Yu., UspenskyN.I.
   (2004). Features of the structure of the Karelian region according to geoelectric researches. Deep structure and seismicity of the Karelo-Kola region (ed. N.V.Sharov). Petrozavodsk: Kar.SC RAS, 2004. P.102–130.
   [Google Scholar]
7. SokolovaE.Yu., GolubtsovaNS, KovtunAA, KulikovVA, LozovskyIN, PushkarevP.Yu., RokityanskyII, TaranYa.V., YakovlevA. G.
   (2016). Results of synchronous magnetotelluric and magnetovariational soundings in the Ladoga anomaly of electrical conductivity. Geophysika. №1. P. 48–64 (in Russian).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Varentsov, Iv.M., Sokolova, E.Yu., and EMTESZ-PomeraniaWG
   , (2005). The magnetic control approach for the reliable estimation of transfer functions in the EMTESZ-Pomerania project, Study of geological structures containing well-conductive complexes in Poland, Publ. Inst. Geophys. Pol. Acad. Sci., Warszawa, C-95(386), 67–80.
   [Google Scholar]
9. VarentsovIv.M.
   (2007). Joint robust inversion of magnetotelluric and magnetovariational data.
   [Google Scholar]
10. PajunpaaK.
    (1986). Conductions anomalies on the Baltic shield in Finland. Geoph. J.R.
    [Google Scholar]
11. GolubsovaN.S., Kováčiková, S., Sokolovae.Yu., LADOGA WG
    . (2017). Study of the deep conductivity structure of Lake Ladoga region: quasi-3D and 3D models. In: Deep structure and geodynamics of Lake Ladoga region. Petrozavodsk, Inst. of Geology of the KRC RAS. P.287–291
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kováčiková, S., Červ, V. and Praus, O.
    , (2005). Modelling of the conductance distribution at the eastern margin of the European Hercynides, Studia geophys. geod., 49, 403–421.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mints, M.V., Sokolova, E.Yu., LADOGA Working Group
    , (2017). Volumetric model of the deep structure of the Svecofennian accretionary orogen based on data from CMP seismic profiling, MT sounding and density modeling. Proceedings of the Karelian Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Precambrian Geology. No. 11 (in Russian). https: doi.org/10.17076/geo656.
    https://doi.org/10.17076/geo656 [Google Scholar]