1887

Abstract

Summary

When modeling non-Newtonian flows through porous media, numerical difficulties arise due to the velocity-dependence of phase mobilities. While a fully implicit treatment is unconditionally stable in the von Neumann sense, it leads to at least a 19-point stencil on 3D hexahedral grids; its implementation is therefore complex and its computational cost is high. Simpler semi-implicit schemes are often encountered, whereby the pressure gradient driving the flow is treated implicitly while the velocity-argument of mobilities is evaluated explicitly. These are however only conditionally stable, and in some practical situations of interest, clearly non-monotone. In this context, a quasi-implicit discretization has recently been proposed, where the velocity-argument of the mobilities is evaluated at cell edges with an implicit normal component, and an explicit transverse component. It has better stability and monotonicity properties than conventional semi-implicit schemes, while requiring only a 7-point stencil on 3D hexahedral grids.

This quasi-implicit scheme was implemented in our parallel in-house research reservoir simulator to model non-Newtonian polymer flows. A detailed description of its implementation is provided, accommodating different rheological models. Extensive numerical tests in various geometries are then performed to validate the implementation and illustrate the advantages of the new scheme.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802119
2018-09-03
2020-07-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aavatsmark, I.
    [2002] An introduction to multipoint flux approximations for quadrilateral grids.Computational Geosciences, 6(3–4), 405–432.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AlSofi, A.M. and Blunt, M.J.
    [2010] Streamline-Based Simulation of Non-Newtonian Polymer Flooding.SPE Journal, 15, 895–905.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aziz, K. and Settari, A.
    [1979] Petroleum Reservoir Simulation. Applied Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cannella, W.J., Huh, C. and Seright, R.S.
    [1988] Prediction of Xanthan Rheology in Porous Media. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coats, K.H.
    [2003] IMPES stability: selection of stable timesteps.SPE Journal, 8, 181–187.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Delshad, M., Kim, D.H., Magbagbeola, O.A., Huh, C., Pope, G.A. and Tarahhom, F.
    [2008] Mechanistic Interpretation and Utilization of Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Solutions for Improved Polymer-Flood Efficiency. In: SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Delshad, M., Pope, G.A. and Sepehrnoori, K.
    [2013] UTCHEM Technical Documentation.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Foulser, R.W.S. and Goodyear, S.G.
    [1989] Improved Stability of the IMPES Formulation for Chemical Flooding. In: SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Groisman, A. and Steinberg, V.
    [2000] Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow.Nature, 405(6782), 53.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliburton
    [2014] Nexus Technical Reference Guide.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lake, L.
    [1989] Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. de Loubens, R., Patacchini, L. and Moncorgé, A.
    [2013] Adaptive-Implicit Strategy for Treating Velocity-Dependent Mobilities in Reservoir Simulation. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Michelsen, M.L. and Mollerup, J.
    [2007] Thermodynamic Models: Fundamentals and Computational Aspects. Tie-Line Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell, J., Lyons, K., Howe, A.M. and Clarke, A.
    [2016] Viscoelastic polymer flows and elastic turbulence in three-dimensional porous structures. Soft Matter, 12(2), 460–468.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Moncorge, A., Patacchini, L. and de Loubens, R.
    [2012] Multi-phase, multi-component simulation framework for advanced recovery mechanisms. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Patacchini, L. and de Loubens, R.
    [2013] A Class of Physically Stable Non-linear Models of Flow Through Anisotropic Porous Media.Transport in porous media, 97, 409–429.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. [2014] Linear stability analysis of the explicit treatment of mobilities in non-Newtonian and non-Darcy porous media flow simulation.Computational Geosciences, 18, 185–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. [2018] Quasi-implicit scheme for treating velocity-dependent mobilities in porous media flows.Submitted to Computational Geosciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Patacchini, L., de Loubens, R., Moncorgé, A. and Trouillaud, A.
    [2012] Four-Fluid-Phase, Fully Implicit Simulation of Surfactant Flooding.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 17, 271–285.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Patacchini, L., de Loubens, R. and Trouillaud, A.
    [2013] New insights on the treatment of velocity-dependent mobilities in reservoir simulation. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Peaceman, D.W.
    [1983] Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation With Nonsquare Grid Blocks and Anisotropic Permeability.SPE Journal, 23, 531–543.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schlumberger
    [2013] Eclipse Technical Description.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. [2016] Intersect Technical Description.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Seright, R.S., Fan, T., Wavrik, K. and Balaban, R.D.C.
    [2011] New Insights Into Polymer Rheology in Porous Media. SPE Journal, 16(01), 35–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Zami-Pierre, F., de Loubens, R., Quintard, M. and Davit, Y.
    [2017] Polymer Flow Through Porous Media: Numerical Prediction of the Contribution of Slip to the Apparent Viscosity.Transport in Porous Media, 119, 521–538.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802119
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802119
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error