1887

Abstract

Summary

Our work focuses on developing a novel approach to improving reservoir characterization using the Adjoint method applied to history matching and optimization workflows. The developed approach, termed the “Adjointbased model screening method”, can be used to reveal hidden reservoir features not captured in reservoir models. The need for the development of our model screening method is necessitated by reservoir simulation models that miss important reservoir behaviours occurring beneath the surface. The impact of such modelling practice on history matching is the extreme tweaking of reservoir parameters to fit such models to available measured data. This paper demonstrates the strength of our approach in revealing the location of hidden faults and channels using synthetic homogeneous models.

Over the course of our research, an efficient model screening approach capable of revealing hidden reservoir behaviour has been developed and subjected to synthetic homogeneous blind tests. Our model screening approach utilizes reservoir permeabilities as input to screen our synthetic homogeneous models for hidden reservoir features like faults and channels. Observed data are generated from cases containing faults and/or channels and cases without these faults/channels are defined as the starting case. The Adjoint method is then used to reveal the location of these hidden reservoir features on a grid block basis.

In order to ascertain the superiority of our model screening approach, we compared the performance of our approach to other approaches reported in literature [Capacitance Resistance Model (CRM) and Interwell Numerical Simulation Model with Front Tracking (INSIM-FT)]. Results obtained demonstrate that our Adjoint-based model screening method is capable of handling varying and constant water injection rates as opposed to other approaches mentioned that can handle only varying injection rates. In addition, besides revealing the location of channels and faults, our approach infers the degree of transmissivity of faults. The developed approach was tested with 2-D and 3-D homogeneous models and results obtained proved that regardless of model dimensionality, hidden reservoir features can be revealed.

The most significant finding is that the accuracy of the adjoint-based model screening method in revealing the location of hidden reservoir features depends on the number of wells existing in the reservoir and their arrangement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802141
2018-09-03
2020-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albertoni, A., Lake, L. W.
    2003. Inferring Interwell Connectivity Only From Well-Rate Fluctuations in Waterfloods. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering6, pp 6–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Almuallim, H., Edwards, K., Ganzer, L.
    , 2010. History-Matching With Sensitivity-Based Parameter Modifications at Grid-Block Level, SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Daoud, A. M., Vega, L.
    , 2006. 3D Field-Scale Automatic History Using Adjoint Sensitivities and Generalized Travel Time Inversion, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gherabati, R. G., Zhang, H., White, C. D.
    2012. A Large Scale Network Model To Obtain Interwell Formation Characteristics. SPE Western Regional Meeting. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo, Z., Reynolds, A. C.
    2017. A Physics-Based Data-Driven Model for History-Matching, Prediction and Characterization of Waterflooding Performance. SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Holanda, R. W., Gildin, E.
    , 2015. Improved Waterflood Analysis using the Capacitance-Resistance Model Within a Control Systems, SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaviani, D., Valko, P. P., Jensen, J. L.
    2010. Application of the Multiwell Productivity Index-Based Method to Evaluate Interwell Connectivity. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, R.
    , 2001. Conditioning Geostatistical Models to Three Dimensional, Three Phase Production Data by Automatic History Matching, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Liu, N.
    , 2008. Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching, Cambridge University Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Panda, M. N., Chopra, A. K.
    1998. An Integrated Approach to Estimate Well Interactions. SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sayarpour, M.
    2008. Development and Application of Capacitance-Resistive Models to Water/CO2 Flood. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schulze-Riegert, R., Chataigner, F., Pajonk, O., Baffoe, J., Ajala, I., Awofodu, D., Almuallim, H.
    , 2013. Strategic Scope of Alternative Optimization Methods in History Matching and Prediction Workflows. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tian, C., Horne, R. N.
    2016. Inferring Interwell Connectivity Using Production Data. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yousef, A. A., Lake, L. W., Jensen, J. L.
    2006. Analysis and Interpretation of Interwell Connectivity From Production and Injection Rate Fluctuations Using a Capacitance Model. SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, H., Kang, Z., Zhang, X., Sun, H., Cao, L., Reynolds, A. C.
    2015. INSIM: A Data-Driven Model for History Matching and Prediction for Waterflooding Monitoring and Management with a Field Application. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802141
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802141
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error