1887

Abstract

Summary

The results of the created methodology for evaluating the economic viability of installing subsea technologies for Oil-Water (O-W) Separation and Produced Water Re-Injection (PWRI) in mature offshore fields as a solution for water production management by using Integrated Asset Modeling (IAM) are presented. The methodology was tested in the benchmark case UNISIM-I-D showing excellent results, nevertheless, its application can be extensible to any other field where the installation of this kind of subsea systems is being analyzed.

Through the explicit coupling of specialized simulators of reservoir, multiphase flow in the tubing, production network, and economic modeling is possible both forecasting the production behavior of the field and generating the economic scenarios in a more realistic manner when the complex subsea systems are included to the production network. The equipment modeled consists of a subsea O-W separator located at the producer wellhead and a subsea pump that directly re-injects the separated water to the injector wellhead. Although the model has some simplifications, it permitted evaluating the implementation from a reservoir engineering perspective and knowing the production response without losing the representativeness of phenomena occurring in the field.

Besides being an economically attractive solution, it is also environmentally friendly because of the water used for injection is the produced water from the wells. Separating the water from the hydrocarbon stream has other additional benefits that favor the oil production from the reservoir and hence, positively influence the Oil Recovery Factor (ORF). For instance, the relief of water-and-liquid capacity of the platform, oil production anticipation associated with high amounts of produced water and decreasing the pressure drop along from the flowline to the platform. In fact, the results obtained from the economic model shows that this solution might be viable due to the revenues anticipation that from another way would not be possible to be earned without considering the implementation of these technologies.

This work can be considered as an interdisciplinary approach where including this kind of subsea technologies in the production network and its influence in the production of the reservoir have to be analyzed from a holistic point of view. Several disciplines as reservoir engineering, production engineering, and economic calculations are involved in building a coupled model that permits analyzing multiple production scenarios and network configurations, determining the best arrangement of the components, evaluating the economic viability of the project and supporting the making-decision process during field management.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802147
2018-09-03
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abelsson, C., Hofstad, Å., Rønning, P., B. de Souza, V.H., Hauge, S.H.
    [2016] Subsea pump system technology.Rio Oil & Gas. Expo and Conference. Rio de Janeiro, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Albuquerque, F. A., Vianna, F. L. V., Alves, R. P., Kuchpil, C., Morais, M. G. G., Orlowski, R. T. C., Ribeiro, O.
    [2013] Subsea processing systems: future vision.Offshore Technology Conference, 2–4. doi:10.4043/24161‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.4043/24161-MS [Google Scholar]
  3. Barroso, A.S., Sleight, N., A.Seixas, M., Oliveira, N., Farias, M., Ribeiro, P., Carrera, S.
    [2016] Production development and evolving technology applied to BC-10 block, Campos Basin, Brazil. Rio Oil & Gas. Expo and Conference.Rio de Janeiro, 1–7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bringedal, B., Ingebretsen, T., Haugen, K.
    [1999] Subsea separation and reinjection of produced water.Offshore Technology Conference, 1–5. doi:10.4043/10967‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.4043/10967-MS [Google Scholar]
  5. Computer Modelling Group LTD
    . Results 3D user guide. Visualization and Analysis [2014].
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Figueiredo, M. W.
    [2005] Application of subsea O/W separation: main drives and challenges.Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2–5. doi: 10.2118/97375‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.2118/97375-MS [Google Scholar]
  7. De Naurois, H. J. and Desalos, A. P.
    [2001] Enabling/enhancing technologies: value-ranking process and results.Offshore Technology Conference, 1–3. doi:10.4043/13089‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.4043/13089-MS [Google Scholar]
  8. Gaspar, A.T., Avansi, G. D., Santos, A.A., Hohendorff Filho, J.C.V., Schiozer, D.J.
    [2015] UNISIM-I-D: benchmark studies for oil field development and production strategy selection.International Journal of Modeling and Simulation for the Petroleum Industry, 9 (1), 21–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hannisdal, A., Westra, R., Akdim, M. R., Bymaster, A., Grave, E., & Teng, D. T.
    [2012] Compact separation technologies and their applicability for subsea field development in deep water.Offshore Technology Conference, 1–3. doi:10.4043/23223‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.4043/23223-MS [Google Scholar]
  10. Hendricks, R., McKenzie, L. J., Jahnsen, O. F., Storvik, M., Hasan, Z.
    [2016] Subsea separation –an undervalued tool for increased oil recovery IOR.Society of Petroleum Engineer, 1–12. doi:10.2118/182454‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/182454-MS [Google Scholar]
  11. Khoi, V., V., Fantoft, R., Shaw, C. K., Gruehagen, H.
    [2009] Comparison of subsea separation systems.Offshore Technology Conference, 1–2. doi:10.4043/20080‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.4043/20080-MS [Google Scholar]
  12. Meira, L. A. A., Coelho, G. P., Santos, A. A. S., Schiozer, D. J.
    [2016] Selection of representative models for decision analysis under uncertainty.Computers & Geosciences88, 67–82, ISSN 00983004. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.11.012
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meira, L. A., Coelho, G. P., Silva, C. G., Schiozer, D. J., Santos, A. S.
    [2017] RMFinder 2.0: an improved interactive multi-criteria scenario reduction methodology.Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2–6. doi:10.2118/185502-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Pereira, R. M., Campos, M. C. M. M. DE, De Oliveira, D. A., De Souza, R. DosS. A., Filho, M. M. C., Orlowski, R., Fares, M.
    [2012] SS: Marlim 3 phase subsea separation system: controls design incorporating dynamic simulation work.Offshore Technology Conference, 1–2. doi:10.4043/23564‑MS.
    https://doi.org/10.4043/23564-MS [Google Scholar]
  15. Schiozer, D. J., Santos, A. A. S., Drumond, P. S.
    [2015] Integrated model based decision analysis in twelve steps applied to petroleum fields development and management.Society of Petroleum Engineers, 3–10. doi:10.2118/174370‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/174370-MS [Google Scholar]
  16. ShohamO.
    [2006] Mechanistic modeling of gas-liquid two-phase flow in pipes.Society of Petroleum Engineers. ISBN: 978-1-55563-107-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Silveira, A.N. Bampi, D.Brasil, T.E.Carvalho, K.G.Ferreira, M.N.Guarda, M.Moreira
    , D.C. [2016] Revitalização De Campos Maduros Offshore: Marlim e o novo desafio. Rio Oil & Gas. Expo and Conference.Rio de Janeiro, 2–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. T.Daniel, SantosE., SantiagoL.P.
    [2008] Métodos de valoração de tecnologias. Laboratório de Apoio à Decisão e Confiabilidade. Departamento de Engenharia de Produção. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 3–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Teixeira, G.
    [2013] Estudo da tecnologia de separação submarina gás-líquido através da modelagem integrada da produção. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica e Instituto de Geociências. Campinas. 147p. Dissertação (Mestrado).
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802147
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802147
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error