1887

Abstract

Summary

Novel fractional-step higher resolution hybrid cell-centred finite-volume formulations are presented for twophase and three component two-phase flow with gravity on structured and unstructured grids. We note that previous hybrid methods [1] are first order and presented for structured grids.

The Darcy-flux is approximated by a control-volume distributed multipoint flux approximation (CVD-MPFA) coupled with a higher resolution approximation for convective transport. The CVD-MPFA method is used for Darcy-flux approximations involving pressure and gravity flux operators, leading to a novel formulation for two-phase and three-component two-phase flow on unstructured grids.

Comparisons with both higher resolution and standard first order characteristic based upwind methods and classical phase upwinding is presented.

Results demonstrate the benefits of the new methods for a range of problems including channel flow and shale-barrier problems.

[1] S. Lee, Y. Efendiev, H. Tchelepi, Hybrid upwind discretization of nonlinear two phase flow with gravity, Advances in Water Resources 82 (2015) 27–38.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802151
2018-09-03
2020-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. H.A.Friis, M.G.Edwards & J.Mykkeltveit
    , 2008. Symmetric Positive Definite Flux-Continuous Full-Tensor Finite-Volume Schemes on Unstructured Cell Centered Triangular Grids, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. Vol 31, Issue 2, pp. 1192–1220, Doi 10.1137/070692182.
    https://doi.org/10.1137/070692182 [Google Scholar]
  2. T.Barth & D.C.Jespersen
    , 1989. The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, AIAA paper 89–0366.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. M.G.Edwards
    , 2006. Higher-resolution hyperbolic-coupled-elliptic flux-continuous CVD schemes on structured and unstructured grids in 2-D, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 51, 1059–1077.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Y.W.Xie & M.G.Edwards
    , 2017. Higher resolution total velocity Vt and Va finite-volume formulations on cell-centred structured and unstructured grids, Computational Geosciences, 21, 921–936.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. D.W.Peaceman
    , 1977. Fundamentals of Numerical Reservoir Simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Y.Brenier & J.Jaffré
    , 1991. Upstream differencing for multiphase flow in resorvoir simulation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 28, 685–696.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. R.J.Leveque
    , 2004. Finite-Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. M.G.Edwards
    , 2010. Global and Local Central Non-upwind Finite Volume Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Porous Media, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids Vol 64, Issue 7, 793–811.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. S.H.Lee, Y.Efendiev & H.A.Tchelepi
    , 2015. Hybrid upwind discretization of nonlinear two-phase flow with gravity, Advances in Water Resources, 27–38, 82, http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.04.007.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. G.Strang
    , 1968. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis5.3, 506–517.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. P.Siegel, R.Mosé, P.Ackerer, & J.Jaffré
    , 1997. Solution of the advection–diffusion equation using a combination of discontinuous and mixed finite elements, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Wiley Online Library, 24, 595–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. D.Nayagum, G.Schäfer, & R.Mosé
    , 2004. Modelling Two-Phase Incompressible Flow in Porous Media Using Mixed Hybrid and Discontinuous Finite Elements, Computational Geosciences, 8, 49–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. K.Aziz and A.Settari
    , 1979. Petroleum Reservoir Simulation, pub Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. J. A.Trangenstein
    , 2008. Numerical solution of hyperbolic conservation laws, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. J. B.Bell, P.Colella, & J. A.Trangenstein
    , 1989. Higher order Godunov methods for general systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics, 82, 362–397.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802151
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802151
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error