The aim of any oil producing company is daily effective and safe oil production. To maximize the extraction of oil from oil reservoirs, it is necessary to continuously improve the work of the oil industry, carry out various measures to optimize the work of producing and injection wells, maintain optimal reservoir pressure, and use modern approved and tested methods of increasing oil recovery. Also, it is necessary to improve the technology of oil production by automating the management of the production process on the basis of “i-fields” concept. When considering large and complex oil and gas fields, the implementation of such technologies requires their qualitative research. Operative decision-making and optimal exploitation of fields imply the need for modeling and monitoring of these fields in real time with the involvement of modern software and hardware.

When managing a field, real-time collection and processing of information is required. Whereas, not all fields are provided with advanced infrastructure for wireline data collection. For them, it is suggested to collect and pre-process data in the fields in an automatic mode with the help of sensors of the embedded system (FPGA-based system).

Given work devoted to development of the intellectual distributed high-performance information system of analysis of different scenarios of the oil production to determine optimal development parameters of oil fields. Proposed system uses thermal compositional model taking into account chemical reactions and supports high-performance computing based on CUDA technology for mobile platforms and MPI for supercomputers in realtime. System allows rapid sequence reading from wells using sensors and controllers (FPGA) and if necessary preprocess data for usage in further calculations.

The principles of Closed-Loop Reservoir Management (CLRM) methodology will be used as a basis, which is a combination of optimization of the life cycle and comparison of the development history of a field. The implementation of this requires large computational resources with the use of procedures for assessing the Value of Information (VOI). Different methods of data clustering (K-averages, multidimensional scaling and tensor decomposition) comparing to select a limited number of representative members from the ensemble of field models with the choice of the optimal set of controls for multiple modeling scenarios.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. AhmedT.
    Reservoir Engineering Handbook. Gulf Professional Publishing, 3rd edition2006. 1376 pages.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. BarrosE.G.D., YapF.K., InsuastyE., Van Den HofP.M.J., JansenJ.D.
    Clustering Techniques for Value-of-information Assessment in Closed-loop Reservoir Management. ECMOR XV - 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery29 August – 1 September2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bethel E.Wes, ChildsHank, HansenCharles
    . High Performance Visualization: Enabling Extreme-Scale Scientific Insight. Chapman and Hall/CRC. - 520 P. – 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. BorisovV. E., KritskiyB. V., MarchenkoN. A., MitrushkinD. A., SavenkovE. B.
    Non-isothermal compositional flow model with chemical reactions and active solid phase for reservoir simulation. KIAM Preprint No 91, Moscow, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BP global
    - https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/technology/technology-now/digital-technology.html.
  6. ChenY., LallierF., MoncorgeA.
    . On Uncertainty Quantification of History Matched Facies Models. ECMOR XV - 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery29 August – 1 September2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Z.
    [2006] Reservoir Simulation: mathematical techniques in oil recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. [2007] Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DelshadM., ThomasS.G., WheelerM.F.
    Parallel numerical reservoir simulations of non-isothermal compositional flow and chemistry. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium held in The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2–4 February2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. EidsvikJo, MukerjiTapan, BhattacharjyaDebarun, DuttaGeetartha
    . Value of information analysis of geophysical data for drilling decisions / Petroleum Geostatistics Biarritz, France, 7–11 September 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Farshidi SaraF., FanYaqing, DurlofskyLoius J., TchelepiHamdi A.
    Chemical Reaction Modeling in a Compositional Reservoir-Simulation Framework. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium held in The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 18–20 February2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foerster RebeccaM., Poth ChristianH., BehlerChristian, BotschMario and SchneiderWerner X.
    Erratum: Using the virtual reality device Oculus Rift for neuropsychological assessment of visual processing capabilities Scientific Reports 6, Article number: 37016 (2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. HauserM.
    Digital Energy: Chevron i-Field - A Case Study - https://www.spegcs.org/events/1562/
  14. HelmyTarek, RahmanS. M.
    , Hossain Muhammad Imtiaz, Abdelraheem Abdulaziz. Non-linear Heterogeneous Ensemble Model for Permeability Prediction of Oil Reservoirs / Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, June 2013, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 1379–1395.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ImankulovT.S., Akhmed-ZakiD.
    Computer Modelling of Non-isothermal, Multiphase and Multicomponent Flow by Using Combined EOR Technologies. ECMOR XV - 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery29 August – 1 September2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. JafarpourBehnam
    . Oil reservoir characterization using ensemble data assimilation. PhD Thesis. 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. JansenJ. D., FonsecaR. M., Kahrobaei1S., SirajM. M., Van EssenG. M. and Van den HofP. M. J.
    The egg model – a geological ensemble for reservoir simulation. Geoscience Data Journal1: 192–195 (2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. JungSeungpil, LeeKyungbook, ParkChanghyup, ChoeJonggeun
    . Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation in Reservoir Characterization: A Review / Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(2), pages 1–23, February. 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. MadaharA., McintoshA., MusatfinI., McAlonanN.
    . Shell’s Smart Fields - Sustaining and Accelerating Benefits from Intelligent Fields. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE 150424), 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MaurandN., MayouraSh., ParraT., Carlos Henrique Vieira Araujo, Claudio José Alves Furtado
    . Coupling Compositional Flow, Thermal Effects and Geochemistry Reactions when Injecting CO2 in a Carbonated Oil Field. Energy Procedia, Elsevier, Volume 51, 2014, Pages 316–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. NiehorsterD.C., LiL., LappeM.
    The Accuracy and Precision of Position and Orientation Tracking in the HTC Vive Virtual Reality System for Scientific Research. i-Percept. SAGE J. 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. PedersonK.S., ChristensenP.L.
    Phase Behavior of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids. 2006 by CRC Press. 422 pages
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ReddickC., CastroA., PannettI, JohnPerry, JeffDickens, CarlSisk, GraemeVerra, ShawnShiradi
    . BP’s Field Of The Future Program: Delivering Success. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE 112194), 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Reidar B.Bratvold, J.Eric Bickel, HansPetter Lohne
    . Value of Information in the Oil and Gas Industry: Past, Present, and Future //SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. Vol. 12, Issue 04, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SamarskiiA.A., NikolaevE.S.
    Methods for solving grid equations. - Nauka, 1978, -592 p.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shirangi MehrdadG., Durlofsky LouisJ.
    Closed-loop Field Development Optimization under Uncertainty. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium held in Houston, Texas, USA, 23–25 February2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Smart Fields Consortium
    – https://smartfields.stanford.edu/
  28. SunW., DurlofskyL.J., HoiM.H.
    Production Forecasting and Uncertainty Quantification for a Naturally Fractured Reservoir using a New Data-Space Inversi. ECMOR XV - 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery29 August – 1 September2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TerehovA.V.
    Parallel dichotomy algorithm for solving tridiagonal system of linear equations with multiple right-handsides //ParallelComput. -2010. -Vol.36. – issue 8. –P.423–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Trainor-GuittonWhitney J., RamirezAbelardo, ZiagosJohn, MellorsRobert and RobertsJeffery
    . An initial value of information (VOI) framework for geophysical data applied to the exploration of geothermal energy / PROCEEDINGS, Thirty-Eighth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 11–13, 2013 SGP-TR-198
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vulkan Overview
    – https://www.khronos.org/vulkan/

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error