1887

Abstract

Summary

Field development plan optimization under uncertainty requires a consistent analysis of well placement across the geological realizations to evaluate the selected cost function. Special care has to be taken in the well trajectory description in the target zone, to allow in the same formulation vertical, deviated and directional well assessment for a more effective decision making. In case of structural uncertainty well trajectories will cross different grid elements in each realization. The workflow proposes a methodology to screen well trajectories based on the expected productivity overall the realizations and the fulfillment of user defined constrains. Well constrains can include, inter-well distance, well length, distance from the closest fault. For a consistent uncertainty propagation and an efficient optimization a nested optimization loop has also been proposed to allow the well screening before the actual reservoir simulation evaluation and allow only the most promising strategies to be evaluated and, therefore, reducing the overall computational burden. The workflow has been tested on a real reservoir case showing the strength of the methodology in assessing the location for an infill and a sidetrack well and improving the understanding of the reservoir dynamic behavior.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802209
2018-09-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CunhaA.A.L., DuncanG., BontempoA., PachecoM.A.C.
    (2018) Optimum Wells Placement in Oil Fields Using Cellular Genetic Algorithms and Space Efficient Chromosomes. In: BiY., KapoorS., BhatiaR. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2016. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 751. Springer, Cham
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Emerick, A.A., Silva, E., Messer, B., Almeida, L.F., Szwarcman, D., Pacheco, M.A.C., Vellasco, M.M.B.R.
    (2009).: Well placement optimization using a genetic algorithm with nonlinear constraints. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hanea, R. G., Casanova, P., Hustoft, L., Bratvold, R. B., Nair, R., Hewson, C., … Fonseca, R. M.
    (2017). Drill and Learn: A Decision Making Workflow to Quantify Value of Learning. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/182719‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/182719-MS [Google Scholar]
  4. Isebor, O. J.
    (2013). Derivative-Free Generalized Field Development Optimization. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/167633‑STU
    https://doi.org/10.2118/167633-STU [Google Scholar]
  5. Molina, A. R., & Rincon, A. A.
    (2009). Exploitation Plan Design Based on Opportunity Index Analysis in Numerical Simulation Models. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/122915‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/122915-MS [Google Scholar]
  6. Nwachukwu, A., Jeong, H., Sun, A., Pyrcz, M., & Lake, L. W.
    (2018). Machine Learning-Based Optimization of Well Locations and WAG Parameters under Geologic Uncertainty. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/190239-MS
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Onwunalu, J. E., & Durlofsky, L.
    (2011). A New Well-Pattern-Optimization Procedure for Large-Scale Field Development. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/124364‑PA
    https://doi.org/10.2118/124364-PA [Google Scholar]
  8. RussellEberhart and JamesKennedy
    (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995. MHS ’95., Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on, pages 39–43
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Suslick, S.B., Furtado, R.
    (2001). Quantifying the value of technological, environmental and financial gain in decision models for offshore oil exploration Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, London, v.32, n.2–4, p. 115–125.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shirangi, M. G., & Durlofsky, L. J.
    (2015). Closed-Loop Field Development Optimization Under Uncertainty. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/173219‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/173219-MS [Google Scholar]
  11. Torrado, R. R., De Paola, G., Fernandez Perez, A., Fuenmayor, A. A. R., De Azevedo, M. S., & Embid, S.
    (2015). Optimize a WAG Field Development Plan, Use Case of Carbonate Ultra-Deep Water Reservoir. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/174344‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/174344-MS [Google Scholar]
  12. Torrado, R. R., Echeverria Ciaurri, D., Mello, U., & Embid, S.
    (2013). Fast Reservoir Performance Evaluation Under Uncertainty: Opening New Opportunities. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/166392‑MS
    https://doi.org/10.2118/166392-MS [Google Scholar]
  13. Torrado, R. R.; Rios, J.; Tesauro, G
    , (2017). Optimal Sequential Drilling for Hydrocarbon Field Development Planning. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, North America
    [Google Scholar]
  14. XuewenXia, LingGui, Zhi-HuiZhan
    ,(2018), A multi-swarm particle swarm optimization algorithm based on dynamical topology and purposeful detecting, Applied Soft Computing, Volume 67,2018, Pages 126–140, ISSN 1568-4946,
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802209
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802209
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error