Well Optimisation With Goal-Based Sensitivity Maps Using Time Windows And Ensemble Perturbations

References

1. Attia, A.
   [2016] Advanced Sampling Methods for Solving Large-Scale Inverse Problems. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blum, J., Le Dimet, F.X. and Navon, I.M.
   [2009] Data Assimilation for Geophysical Fluids. In: Temam, R.M. and Tribbia, J.J. (Eds.) Special Volume: Computational Methods for the Atmosphere and the Oceans, Handbook of Numerical Analysis, 14, Elsevier, 385–441.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brooks, R.H. and Corey, A.T.
   [1964] Hydraulic properties of porous media. In: Hydrology Papers.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cacuci, D.G.
   [2015] Second-order adjoint sensitivity analysis methodology (2nd-ASAM) for computing exactly and efficiently first- and second-order sensitivities in large-scale linear systems: I. Computational methodology.Journal of Computational Physics, 284, 687–699.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cacuci, D.G., Ionescu-Bujor, M. and Navon, I.M.
   [2005] Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis, Volume II: Applications to Large-Scale Systems.CRC Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Che, Z., Fang, F., Percival, J., Pain, C.C., Matar, O. and Navon, I.M.
   [2014] An ensemble method for sensor optimisation applied to falling liquid films.International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 67, 153–161.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gomes, J.L.M.A., Pavlidis, D., Salinas, P., Xie, Z., Percival, J.R., Melnikova, Y., Pain, C.C. and Jackson, M.D.
   [2017] A Force-Balanced Control Volume Finite Element Method for Multiphase Porous Media Flow Modelling.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 83, 431–445.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Heaney, C.E., Salinas, P., Fang, F., Pain, C.C. and Navon, I.M.
   [2018] Goal-based sensitivity maps using time windows and ensemble perturbations.ArXiv e-prints.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hossen, M.J., Navon, I.M. and Daescu, D.N.
   [2012] Effect of random perturbations on adaptive observation techniques.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 69(1), 110–123.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ionescu-Bujor, M. and Cacuci, D.G.
    [2004] A Comparative Review of Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of Large-Scale Systems-I: Deterministic Methods.Nuclear Science and Engineering, 147(3), 189–203.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jackson, M.D., Percival, J.R., Mostaghimi, P., Tollit, B.S., Pavlidis, D., Pain, C.C., Gomes, J.L.M.A., El-Sheikh, A.H., Salinas, P., Muggeridge, A.H. and Blunt, M.J.
    [2015] Reservoir Modeling for Flow Simulation by Use of Surfaces, Adaptive Unstructured Meshes, and an Overlapping-Control-Volume Finite-Element Method.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 18.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Keller, J.D., Hense, A., Kornblueh, L. and Rhodin, A.
    [2010] On the Orthogonalization of Bred Vectors.Weather and Forecasting, 25, 1219–1234.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Leroux, R., Chatellier, L. and David, L.
    [2018] Time-resolved flow reconstruction with indirect measurements using regression models and Kalman filtered POD ROM.Experiments in Fluids, 59, 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Liu, J. and Kalnay, E.
    [2008] Estimating observation impact without adjoint model in an ensemble Kalman filter.Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 134(634), 1327–1335.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Maday, Y. and Taddei, T.
    [2017] Adaptive PBDW approach to state estimation: noisy observations; user-defined update spaces.ArXiv e-prints.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Merton, S.R., Buchan, A.G., Pain, C.C. and Smedley-Stevenson, R.P.
    [2013] An adjoint-based method for improving computational estimates of a functional obtained from the solution of the Boltzmann Transport Equation.Annals of Nuclear Energy, 54, 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Merton, S.R., Smedley-Stevenson, R.P., Pain, C.C. and Buchan, A.G.
    [2014] Adjoint eigenvalue correction for elliptic and hyperbolic neutron transport problems.Progress in Nuclear Energy, 76, 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nerger, L., Schulte, S. and Bunse-Gerstner, A.
    [2014] On the influence of model nonlinearity and localization on ensemble Kalman smoothing.Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140, 2249–2259.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Power, P.W., Piggott, M.D., Fang, F., Gorman, G.J., Pain, C.C., Marshall, D.P., Goddard, A.J.H. and Navon, I.M.
    [2006] Adjoint goal-based error norms for adaptive mesh ocean modelling.Ocean Modelling, 15(1), 3–38.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Salinas, P., Pavlidis, D., Xie, Z., Jacquemyn, C., Melnikova, Y., Pain, C.C. and Jackson, M.D.
    [2017] Improving the Robustness of the Control Volume Finite Element Method with Application to Multiphase Porous Media Flow.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 85, 235–246.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Shah, A.J.
    [2017] Methods for Data Assimilation for the Purpose of Forecasting in the Gulf of Cambay (Khambhat).IJSRSET, 3, 224–228.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Shapiro, R.
    [1970] Smoothing, Filtering and Boundary Effects.Review of Geophysics and Space Physics, 8, 359–387.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wang, Z., Navon, I.M., Le Dimet, F.X. and Zou, X.
    [1992] The second order adjoint analysis: Theory and applications.Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 50(1), 3–20.
    [Google Scholar]