1887

Abstract

Summary

In unconventional reservoirs, as the effective pore size becomes close to the mean free path of gas molecules, gas transport behavior begins to deviate from Darcy’s law. The objective of this study is to explore the similarities of gas flows in nanochannels and core samples as well as those simulated by direct simulation BGK (DSBGK). a particle-based method that solves the Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) equation.

Due to fabrication difficulties, previous work on gas flow experiments in nanochannels is very limited. In this work, steady-state gas flow was measured in reactive-ion etched nanochannels on a silicon wafer, which have a controlled channel size. A core-flooding apparatus was used to perform steady-state gas flow measurements on carbonate and shale samples. Klinkenberg permeability was obtained under varying pore pressures but constant temperature and effective stress. Same gas was used in nanofluidic and rock experiments, making them directly comparable. Results from both experiments were then compared to gas flow simulations by DSBGK method carried out on several independently constructed geometry models. DSBGK uses hundreds of millions of simulated molecules to approximate gas flow inside the pore space. The intermolecular collisions were handled by directly integrating the BGK equation along each molecule’s trajectory, rather than through a sampling scheme like that in the direct simulation Monte-Carlo (DSMC) method. Consequently, the stochastic noise is significantly reduced, and simulation of nano-scale gas flows in complex geometries becomes computationally affordable.

The Klinkenberg factors obtained from these independent studies varied across three orders of magnitude, yet they all appear to collapse on a single scaling relation where the Klinkenberg factor in the slip flow regime is inversely proportional to the square root of intrinsic permeability over porosity. Our correlation could also fit the data in the literature, which were often obtained using nitrogen, after correcting for temperature and gas properties. This study contributes to rock characterization, well testing analysis as well as the understanding of rarefied gas transport in porous media.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802220
2018-09-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alnoaimi, K. R., and Kovscek, A. R.
    [2013] Experimental and numerical analysis of gas transport in shale including the role of sorption.Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beskok, A. and Karniadakis, G. E.
    [1999] Report: a model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales.Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 3(1), 43–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatnagar, P.L., Gross, E.P. and Krook, M.
    [1954] A model for collision processes in gases. I. Small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems.Physical Review, 94(3), 511.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bird, G.A.
    [1994] Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows. Clarendon, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cho, Y., Ozkan, E., and Apaydin, O. G.
    [2013] Pressure-dependent natural-fracture permeability in shale and its effect on shale-gas well production.SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 16(02), 216–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Civan, F.
    [2010] Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media.Transport in Porous Media, 82(2), 375–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Colin, S., Lalonde, P. and Caen, R.
    [2004]. Validation of a second-order slip flow model in rectangular microchannels.Heat Transfer Engineering, 25(3), 23–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Colin, S.
    [2014]. Single-phase gas flow in microchannels.Heat transfer and fluid flow in minichannels and microchannels, 9–86. Butterworth–Heinemann, Oxford
    [Google Scholar]
  9. [2015] Pressure-Driven Single-Phase Gas Flows.Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2835–2846. Springer, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ertekin, T., King, G. A. and Schwerer, F. C.
    [1986] Dynamic gas slippage: a unique dual-mechanism approach to the flow of gas in tight formations.SPE Formation Evaluation, 1(01), 43–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Florence, F. A., Rushing, J., Newsham, K. E. and Blasingame, T. A.
    [2007] Improved permeability prediction relations for low permeability sands.Proceedings of SPE Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heid, J. G., McMahon, J. J., Nielsen, R. F. and Yuster, S. T.
    [1950] Study of the permeability of rocks to homogeneous fluids.Proceedings of Drilling and Production Practice.American Petroleum Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heller, R., Vermylen, J., and Zoback, M.
    [2014] Experimental investigation of matrix permeability of gas shales.AAPG bulletin, 98(5), 975–995.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, S.C.
    [1972] A rapid accurate unsteady-state Klinkenberg permeameter.SPE Journal, 12(05), 383–397.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones, F. O. and Owens, W. W.
    [1980] A laboratory study of low-permeability gas sands.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 32(09), 1631–1640.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Klinkenberg, L.J.
    [1941] The Permeability of Porous Media to Liquids and Gases.Proceedings of Drilling and Production Practice.American Petroleum Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Letham, E. A. and Bustin, R. M.
    [2016] Klinkenberg gas slippage measurements as a means for shale pore structure characterization.Geofluids, 16(2), 264–278.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Li, S., Dong, M., and Li, Z.
    [2009] Measurement and revised interpretation of gas flow behavior in tight reservoir cores.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 65(1–2), 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, J.
    [2011] Direct simulation method based on BGK equation.Proceedings of AIP Conference, 1333(1), 283–288.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. [2012] Comparison between the DSMC and DSBGK Methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1040.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, J. and Sultan, A.S.
    [2015] Permeability computations of shale gas by the pore-scale Monte Carlo molecular simulations.Proceedings of International Petroleum Technology Conference.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, J. and Cai, C.
    [2017] Numerical study on thermal transpiration flows through a rectangular channel. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.08105.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ling, K.
    [2012] Gas Viscosity at High Pressure and High Temperature (Doctoral dissertation).Texas A & M University.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mason, E. A., Malinauskas, A. P. and Evans, R. B.
    (1967). Flow and diffusion of gases in porous media.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 46(8), 3199–3216.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Newman, M.S. and Yin, X.
    [2013] Lattice Boltzmann simulation of non-Darcy flow in stochastically generated 2D porous media geometries.SPE Journal, 18(01), 12–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan, Z., Ma, Y., Danesh, N. N., Connell, L. D., Sander, R., Down, D. I., and Camilleri, M.
    [2015] Measurement of shale anisotropic permeability and its impact on shale gas production.Proceedings of SPE Asia Pacific Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Ramanathan, S. and Koch, D.L.
    [2009] An efficient direct simulation Monte Carlo method for low Mach number noncontinuum gas flows based on the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook model.Physics of Fluids, 21(3), 033103.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rose, W. D.
    [1948] Permeability and gas-slippage phenomena.Proceedings of Drilling and Production Practice.American Petroleum Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rushing, J. A., Newsham, K. E., Lasswell, P. M., Cox, J. C., and Blasingame, T. A.
    [2004] Klinkenerg-corrected permeability measurements in tight gas sands: steady-state versus unsteady-state techniques.Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sampath, K. and Keighin, C. W.
    [1982] Factors affecting gas slippage in tight sandstones of cretaceous age in the Uinta basin.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 34(11), 2–715.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmitt, M., Fernandes, C. P., Wolf, F. G., da Cunha Neto, J. A. B., Rahner, C. P. and dos Santos, V. S. S.
    [2015] Characterization of Brazilian tight gas sandstones relating permeability and Angstrom-to micron-scale pore structures.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27, 785–807.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sheng, J.J.
    [2015] Enhanced oil recovery in shale reservoirs by gas injection.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 22, 252–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sinha, S., Braun, E. M., Determan, M. D., Passey, Q. R., Leonardi, S. A., Boros, J. A., and Kudva, R. A.
    [2013] Steady-state permeability measurements on intact shale samples at reservoir conditions-effect of stress, temperature, pressure, and type of gas.Proceedings of SPE Middle East oil and gas show and conference.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tanikawa, W. and Shimamoto, T.
    [2009] Comparison of Klinkenberg-corrected gas permeability and water permeability in sedimentary rocks.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 46(2), 229–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Thorstenson, D. C. and Pollock, D. W.
    [1989] Gas transport in unsaturated zones: Multicomponent systems and the adequacy of Fick’s laws.Water Resources Research, 25(3), 477–507.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, J., Chen, L., Kang, Q. and Rahman, S.S.
    [2016] Apparent permeability prediction of organic shale with generalized lattice Boltzmann model considering surface diffusion effect.Fuel, 181, 478–490.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, L.
    [2014] Simulation of slip flow and phase change in nanopores (Doctoral dissertation).Colorado School of Mines.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang, L. and Yin, X.
    [2017] Apparent permeability of flow through periodic arrays of spheres with first-order slip.Powder Technology, 311, 313–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, L., Tian, Y., Yu, X., Wang, C., Yao, B., Wang, S., Winterfeld, P.H., Wang, X., Yang, Z., Wang, Y. and Cui, J.
    [2017] Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs.Fuel, 210, 425–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, S., Lukyanov, A. A., Wang, L., Wu, Y. S., Pomerantz, A., Xu, W. and Klemberg, R.
    [2017] A non-empirical gas slippage model for low to moderate Knudsen numbers.Physics of Fluids, 29(1), 012004.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wei, K. K., Morrow, N. R., and Brower, K. R.
    [1986] Effect of fluid, confining pressure, and temperature on absolute permeabilities of low-permeability sandstones.SPE Formation Evaluation, 1(04), 413–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, K., Chen, Z. and Li, X.
    [2015] Real gas transport through nanopores of varying cross-section type and shape in shale gas reservoirs.Chemical Engineering Journal, 281, 813–825.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu, Q., Bai, B., Ma, Y., Ok, J. T., Yin, X. and Neeves, K.
    [2014] Optic imaging of two-phase-flow behavior in 1D nanoscale channels.SPE Journal, 19(05), 793–802.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Wu, Y. S., and Pruess, K.
    [1998] Gas flow in porous media with Klinkenberg effects.Transport in Porous Media, 32(1), 117–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Wu, Y. S., Li, J., Ding, D., Wang, C. and Di, Y
    [2014] A generalized framework model for the simulation of gas production in unconventional gas reservoirs.SPE Journal, 19(05), 845–857.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Xue, H. and Fan, Q.
    [2000] A new analytic solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for microchannel flows.Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 4(2), 125–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeng, J., Wang, X., Guo, J. and Zeng, F.
    [2017] Composite linear flow model for multi-fractured horizontal wells in heterogeneous shale reservoir.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 38, 527–548.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802220
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802220
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error