1887

Abstract

Summary

We investigate the potential for improved recovery of subsurface energy resources (hydrocarbons or heat) through in-depth diversion technology. A number of pilot studies in the North Sea have demonstrated in recent years that sodium silicate can be used to block preferential flow paths and divert water to previously unswept areas of a reservoir. Accompanying simulation studies based on an explicit weak coupling of a reservoir flow simulator and an external chemical module have attempted to replicate the observed behaviour. Since the development of silicate gels and the accompanying permeability reduction is essentially a coupled flow-chemical process, we first will present a fully implicit compositional-reactive flow and transport implementation and investigate the impact of the grid and time-stepping resolution on simulation performance in 2D subsurface reservoirs mimicking petroleum and geothermal applications. We proceed to investigate the sensitivity of the recovery to design parameters of the in-depth diversion strategy. Since adjoint gradients are not typically available for these parameters and uncertainties associated with an application of in-depth divergence are large, we use an ensemble-based methodology to perform an optimization study. This study aims to find optimal strategies for combined waterflooding and design of in-depth diversion under geological uncertainty. It is demonstrated that in-depth diversion can significantly extend the life-time of hydrocarbon or geothermal fields when the timing of injection and the size of the sodium silicate batch is optimized. Finally, we discuss methods that help to address an issue of computational cost associated with the high resolution required for accurate simulation of the coupled process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802265
2018-09-03
2020-03-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chen, Y., Oliver, D.S., Zhang, D. et al.
    [2009] Efficient ensemble-based closed-loop production optimization.SPE Journal, 14(04), 634–645.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Farshidi, S., Fan, Y., Durlofsky, L. and Tchelepe, H.A.
    [2013] Chemical Reaction modeling in a compositional reservoir simulation framework.SPE 163677.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fonseca, R., Stordal, A., Leeuwenburgh, O., Van den Hof, P. and Jansen, J.D.
    [2014] Robust ensemble-based multi-objective optimization. In: ECMOR XIV-14th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Fonseca, R.R.M., Chen, B., Jansen, J.D. and Reynolds, A.
    [2017] A stochastic simplex approximate gradient (StoSAG) for optimization under uncertainty.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 109(13), 1756–1776.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Garipov, T., Tomin, P., Rin, R., Voskov, D. and Tchelepi, H.
    [2018] Unified Thermo-Compositional-Mechanical Framework for Reservoir Simulation.Computational Geosciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamouda, A.A. and Amiri, H.A.A.
    [2014] Factors affecting alkaline sodium silicate gelation for in-depth reservoir profile modification.Energies, 7(2), 568–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hatzignatiou, D.G., Giske, N.H. et al.
    [2016] Water-Soluble Sodium Silicate Gelants for Water Management in Naturally Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs. In: SPE Europec featured at 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hiorth, A., Sagen, J., Lohne, A., Nossen, J., Vinningland, J., Jettestuen, E. and Sira, T.
    [2016] IORSim-A Simulator for Fast and Accurate Simulation of Multi-phase Geochemical Interactions at the Field Scale. In: ECMOR XV-15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Icopini, G.A., Brantley, S.L. and Heaney, P.J.
    [2005] Kinetics of silica oligomerization and nanocolloid formation as a function of pH and ionic strength at 25 C.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69(2), 293–303.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mayer, E., Berg, R., Carmichael, J., Weinbrandt, R. et al.
    [1983] Alkaline injection for enhanced oil recovery-A status report.Journal of Petroleum Technology, 35(01), 209–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Skrettingland, K., Dale, E.I., Stenerud, V.R., Lambertsen, A.M., Nordaas Kulkarni, K., Fevang, O., Stavland, A. et al.
    [2014] Snorre In-depth Water Diversion Using Sodium Silicate-Large Scale Inter-well Field Pilot. In: SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Skrettingland, K., Giske, N.H., Johnsen, J.H., Stavland, A. et al.
    [2012] Snorre in-depth water diversion using sodium silicate-single well injection pilot. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium.Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stavland, A., Jonsbråten, H., Vikane, O., Skrettingland, K. and Fischer, H.
    [2011] In-depth water diversion using sodium silicate–Preparation for single well field pilot on Snorre. In: IOR 2011-16th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Trujillo, R.
    [2017] In-depth water diversion strategies. Msc thesis, Delft Univeristy of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Trujillo, R., Voskov, D. and Leeuwenburgh, O.
    [2018] Simulation of In-depth Water Diversion Using Sodium Silicate. In: 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Voskov, D.V., Henley, H. and Lucia, A.
    [2017] Fully compositional multi-scale reservoir simulation of various CO2 sequestration mechanisms.Computers and Chemical Engineering, 96, 183–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Voskov, D.V. and Tchelepi, H.A.
    [2012] Comparison of nonlinear formulations for two-phase multi-component EoS based simulation.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 82, 101–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zaydullin, R., Voskov, D., James, S., Henley, H. and Lucia, A.
    [2014] Fully compositional and thermal reservoir simulation.Computers & Chemical Engineering, 63, 51–65.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802265
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802265
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error