1887

Abstract

Summary

With the development of the measuring instruments of Earth’s gravity gradient tensor, the full tensor gravity (FTG) data can be obtained validly and accurately. Their high data resolution induces their application in many research domains. With the improvement of the instrument manufacturing capability, the FTG data can be acquired on the satellite, airborne, vehicle, marine and submarine. And, three dimension data inversion is an effective and significant method for the quantitative interpretation of FTG data. The inversion of large scale data may consume large number of time with the increasing of the data and model parameters. Therefore, in the future development of data processing, researchers not only pay attention to the improvement of inversion method precision, but also pay attention to the improvement of the calculation efficiency. Therefore, a fast and effectively numerical algorithm to improve the inversion efficiency is more meaningful. Accordingly, an improved gradient method with projections onto convex set is used to accelerate the recovery rate of the sub-surface rock density. This gradient method can obtain an optimal gradient direction to give the fastest descent speed of the target function. This new efficient algorithm can make good use of the mass FTG data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802575
2018-09-09
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boulanger, O., & Chouteau, M.
    (2010). Constraints in 3d gravity inversion. Geophysical Prospecting, 49(2), 265–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Coker, M. O., J. P.Bhattacharya, and K. J.Marfurt
    , 2007, Fracture patterns within mudstones on the flanks of a salt dome: Syneresis or slumping?: Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 57, 125–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Geng, M., Huang, D., Yang, Q., & Liu, Y.
    (2014). 3d inversion of airborne gravity-gradiometry data using cokriging. Geophysics, 79(4), G37–G47.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, Y., & Oldenburg, D. W.
    (1998). 3-d inversion of gravity data. Geophysics, 63(1), 109–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Meng, Z.
    (2017). 3d potential field data inversion with 10 quasi - norm sparse constraints. Geophysical Prospecting.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P. & Sheriff, R.E.
    , 1990. Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Meng, Z.
    (2016). 3d inversion of full gravity gradient tensor data using s10 sparse recovery. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 127, 112–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Oliveira, V.C. & Barbosa, V.C.F.
    , 2013. 3-D radial gravity gradient inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 195, 883–902.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Salem, A., S.Masterton, S.Campbell, J. D.Fairhead, J.Dickinson, and C.Murphy
    , 2013, Interpretation of tensor gravity data using an adaptive tilt angle method: Geophysical Prospecting, 61, 1065–1076.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tikhonov, A. N., & Arsenin, V. Y.
    (1977). Solutions of ill-posed problems. Mathematics of Computation, 32(144), 491–491.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhdanov, M. S.
    (2002). Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems /. Elsevier Science.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802575
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802575
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error