1887

Abstract

Summary

The inverse problem of three-dimensional (3D) low-frequency electromagnetic (EM) data is usually formulated as unconditional minimization of the Tikhonov parametric functional. The Gauss-Newton method ensures fast convergence, but has high computational and/or memory complexity due to the need to factorize the Hessian matrix. This difficulty can be overcome only partially by the use of modern massively parallel distributed memory clusters (for example, ). The nonlinear conjugate-gradient (NLCG) or L-BFGS methods are less demanding in terms of computational load and memory consumption, but may suffer from slow convergence at complicated models. There are two approaches, in which a special kind of transformation of model parameters is proposed: a diagonal preconditioner of and the integral-sensitivity approach of . These approaches are essential to achieve a tolerable convergence rate and, in fact, are very similar. Recent examples with these methods include ( ) and (Čuma et al., 2017).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802708
2018-09-09
2020-04-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Commer, M., and Newman, G. A.
    [2008] New advances in three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic inversion, Geophys. J. Int., vol. 172, pp.513–535.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Čuma, M., Gribenko, A., Zhdanov, M.S.
    [2017] Inversion of magnetotelluric data using integral equation approach with variable sensitivity domain: application to Earthscope MT data. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors270, 113–127
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Grayver, A.V., Streich, R., Ritter, O.
    [2013] Three-dimensional parallel distributed inversion of CSEM data using a direct forward solver, Geophys. J. Int.193 (3), 1432–1446
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Newman, G.A., Boggs, P.T.
    [2004] Solution accelerators for large-scale three-dimensional electromagnetic inverse problems, IOP Inverse Problems, vol. 20, S151–S170.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, F., Morten, J.P., Spitzer, K.
    [2018] Anisotropic three-dimensional inversion of CSEM data using finite-element techniques on unstructured grids, Geophys. J. Int., vol. 213, iss.2, PP. 1056–1072
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yavich, N. and Zhdanov, M. S.
    [2016] Contraction pre-conditioner in finite-difference electromagnetic modelling, Geophys. J. Int., vol. 206, iss. 3, pp. 1718–1729.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhdanov, M.S.
    Geophysical Inverse Theory and Regularization Problems, Elsevier, San Diego, CA, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802708
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201802708
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error