1887

Abstract

Summary

We present a velocity independent workflow for constructing a zero-offset reflection section that preserves most of the reflections and diffractions. This workflow constructs a migration image volume by prestack time migration (PSTM) using a series of constant-velocity models. A deblurring filter for each constant-velocity model is applied to each time migration image to get a deblurred image volume. In order to preserve all events in the image volume, each deblurred image panel is demigrated and then summed over the velocity axis. The resulting demigration section is equivalent to a zero-offset reflection section. Compared with the workflow without deblurring filter, the composite zero-offset reflection section has higher resolution. A more accurate estimate of the velocity distribution can be obtained from this workflow using time-migration velocity analysis, which can then used as the velocity model to migrate the zero-offset section. Numerical tests are used to validate the effectiveness of this method with 3D synthetic data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803065
2018-11-27
2024-07-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aoki, N.and Schuster, G.T.
    [2009] Fast least-squares migration with a deblurring filter. Geophysics, 74(6), WCA83–WCA93.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Caers, J.
    [2011] Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Y., Dutta, G., Dai, W. and Schuster, G.T.
    [2017] Q-least-squares reverse time migration with viscoacoustic deblurring filters. Geophysics, 82(6), S425–S438.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dai, W., Schuster, J. et al.
    [2009] Least-squares migration of simultaneous sources data with a deblurring filter. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2009. 2990–2994.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dai, W., Wang, X. and Schuster, G.T.
    [2011] Least-squares migration of multisource data with a deblurring filter. Geophysics, 76(5), R135–R146.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fomel, S. and Landa, E.
    [2014] Structural uncertainty of time-migrated seismic images. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 101, 27–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Glogovsky, V., Landa, E., Langman, S. and Moser, T.J.
    [2009] Validating the velocity model: The Hamburg score. First Break, 27(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Grubb, H., Tura, A. and Hanitzsch, C.
    [2001] Estimating and interpreting velocity uncertainty in migrated images and AVO attributes. Geophysics, 66(4), 1208–1216.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hale, D.
    [1984] Dip-moveout by Fourier transform. Geophysics, 49(6), 741–757.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu, J. and Schuster, G.T.
    [1998] Migration deconvolution. In: SPIE’s International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 118–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu, J., Schuster, G.T. and Valasek, P.A.
    [2001] Poststack migration deconvolution. Geophysics, 66(3), 939–952.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Judson, D., Schultz, P. and Sherwood, J.
    [1978] Equalizing the stacking velocities of dipping events via Devilish. In: Geophysical Prospecting, 26. 669–669.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Schuster, G., Zhan, G., Dai, W. and Boonyasiriwat, C.
    [2010] Acoustic multi-source waveform inversion with deblurring. In: 72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yilmaz, Ö.
    [2001] Seismic data analysis: Processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yilmaz, O.
    [2017] Circumventing velocity uncertainty in imaging complex structures. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017. 5706–5710.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yilmaz, Ö.
    [2018] Circumventing velocity uncertainty in imaging complex structures. The Leading Edge, 37(1), 14–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yilmaz, Ö.g.Ë.a. and Claerbout, J.F.
    [1980] Prestack partial migration. Geophysics, 45(12), 1753–1779.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu, J., Hu, J., Schuster, G.T. and Estill, R.
    [2006] Prestack migration deconvolution. Geophysics, 71(2), S53–S62.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803065
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803065
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error