1887

Abstract

Summary

LWD tools measure behind the bit and consequently have several operational limitations: For instance, in horizontal wells, the geological structure can be projected ahead but assuming a constant dip trend. Such constraints can impact the drilling operations for Well Placement applications in complex environments. Therefore, Schlumberger Stavanger Research center (SSR) has developed a pioneering workflow that provides a calibrated reservoir structure in real-time via integration of surface seismic with ultra-deep azimuthal resistivity inversions, which enables the prediction of reservoir structure up to hundreds of meters ahead of bit, and so increasing the proactivity level of geosteering decisions.

We will be presenting real examples performed while drilling to demonstrate the technological approach. Among them, the case study in the Visund field, located in the Norwegian Continental Shelf where the real-time prediction of structural changes ahead of bit was field tested during the drilling of the horizontal section.

Besides the integrated while drilling approach for the prediction of the reservoir geometry in front of bit, the pioneering technology also refines both the structural and stratigraphic components from borehole to reservoir scale along the horizontal well. Such workflow enables better well placement in complex geological settings and brings geosteering to the next level.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803125
2018-11-05
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arata, F., Mele, M., Tarchiani, C. et al.
    2017. Look Ahead Geosteering via Real Time Integration of Logging While Drilling Measurements with Surface Seismic. Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, USA, 9-11 October. SPE-187203-MS.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakke, J. O. H., GramstadO. and SonnelandL.
    , 2013. Seismic DNA - a novel non-local search method for multi-attribute datasets, First Break, 31, 2 p. 35.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borgos, H. G., Skov, T., Randen, T. and Sonneland, L.
    2003. Automated geometry extraction from 3D seismic data. Expanded Abstract, 73rd Annual Intern. Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, p. 1541–1544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1817590
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Nickel, M. and Sønneland, L.
    , 1999. Non-rigid matching of migrated time-lapse seismic. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1999: pp. 872–875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1821191.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pedersen, S., Trygve, R, Sonneland, et al.
    2002. Automatic Fault Extraction Using Artificial Ants. Presented at SEG Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, 6-11 October. SEG-2002-0512.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803125
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803125
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error