1887

Abstract

Summary

This paper will examine the principal causes of dry holes and will present a two-part strategy that companies can implement to reduce the number of dry holes they drill . Conducting pre-drill audits can reduce your dry holes by 25 to 50% Studies have shown that approximately half of the dry holes that were drilled were dry due to failure of the trap or seal Audits of the maps that were the basis for drilling the well indicate that the majority of wells attributed to trap or seal failure were actually drilled on invalid structure maps Conducting regional reviews or mentoring sessions can further reduce your dry holes Although it will be virtually impossible to eliminate all dry holes, conducting regional reviews or conducting mentoring sessions with your interpreters will hold them accountable for understanding the petroleum system. Mentoring sessions allow your staff to benefit from the knowledge of experts who can bring a fresh perspective and new insights to help your interpreters better understand of the petroleum system, and improve their maps and evaluations, helping you reduce risk and improving your exploration drilling success.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803227
2018-12-03
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Loizou, N.
    , 2003, A post-well analysis of recent years exploration drilling along the UK Atlantic Margin, EAGE Paper, https://www.og.decc.gov.uk/UKpromote/presentations/WOBAtlanticMarginEAGEPaper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Mathieu, C.
    , 2015, Exploration Well Failures from the Moray Firth & Central North Sea (UK), 21 CXRM Project, UK Oil and Gas Authority, https://www.ogauthority.co.uk/media/1582/21cxrm_post_well_analysis_christian_mathieu_talk.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Rudolph, K. W. and F. J.Goulding
    , 2017, Benchmarking exploration predictions and performance using 20+ yr of drilling results: One company’s experience, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, AAPG Bulletin101 (2): 161–176. http://archives.datapages.com/data/bulletns/2017/02feb/BLTN16060/images/bltn16060.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Tearpock, D.J., J.L.Brewton, and R.E.Bischke
    , 1994, Quick Look Techniques For Prospect Evaluation, Subsurface Consultants & Associates LLC., Houston Texas
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tearpock, D.J. and R. E.Bischke
    , 2003, Applied Subsurface Geological Mapping with Structural Methods, 2nd Edition, L. G.Walker, editor, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tearpock, D.J.
    , 2006, What Makes a Good Prospect, AAPG Search and Discovery, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/documents/2006/06124tearpock2/images/tearpock2.pdf.html
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803227
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201803227
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error