1887

Abstract

Summary

To attain the seismic time-lapse response that is characteristic of production-induced changes, high repeatability between seismic vintages is essential. However, in some cases, a change in survey geometry is required for improved imaging and superior future repeatability; for instance, from towed-streamer to ocean-bottom node (OBN) acquisition. The resulting differences in acquisition geometry and recording datums lead to significant inconsistencies in the reservoir illumination that generally cannot be resolved by conventional 4D binning techniques, especially for deep-water fields or in the presence of complex overburden geology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900025
2019-04-01
2020-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Fletcher, R.P., Archer, S., Nichols, D., and Mao, W.
    [2012] Inversion after depth imaging. 82nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gherasim, M., L'Heureux, E., and Lorenzo, Z.
    [2016] Evaluation and correction of sources of 4D noise using modeled ocean-bottom-node data. The Leading Edge, 35(10), 880–886.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hodgson, L., Ball, M., Fowler, S., Gherasim, M., Hance, T., Toomey, A., and van Gestel, J. P.
    [2017] Generating value from 4D through efficient integration. The Leading Edge, 36(5), 401–406.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900025
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900025
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error