1887

Abstract

Summary

Supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) injection in hydrocarbon reservoirs is documented as important means to achieve hydrocarbon potential whilst mitigating the greenhouse gas effect. However, reservoir heterogeneity significantly affects subsurface multiphase flow behaviour thereby oil recovery factor, thus triggering intrinsic uncertainties to manage and predict reservoir performance. In this manuscript, we present the results of a systematic approach to investigate the influences of crossflow and permeability variations in layered core samples on the efficiency of miscible continuous SCCO2 and water alternating gas (WAG) flooding performance. Here, we manufactured heterogeneous porous media by stacking two hemi cylindrical sample (each sample has a different permeability) together. Placing either a lint free tissue paper or a Teflon sheet allowed us to investigate the impact of crossflow on displacement efficiency. The core flooding experiments were conducted under miscible conditions at a reservoir temperature of 343 K and pressure of 17.23 MPa using n C10, synthetic brine and SCCO2. Two different SCCO2 flooding schemes were used; namely, continuous injection of SCCO2 and water alternating SCCO2.

The results obtained from heterogeneous porous media indicate that permeability variations in layered porous media have significantly impact the ultimate recovery for both continuous and WAG flooding. It is also found that crossflow in the layered sample has an appreciable effect on the ultimate oil recovery (i.e. increasing oil recovery by 4.8% as a maximum) when injecting SCCO2 continuously. However, as the permeability variations between layers increases a considerable channelling of the injected SCCO2 through the high permeability layer is dominated which reduces the amount of additional oil mobilised by crossflow. In contrast to the findings of continuous injection of SCCO2, the effect of crossflow during WAG flooding is negatively impacts the recovery factor. Such an outcome by WAG flooding may be attributed to the achievement of conformance control under the non communication layers which otherwise cannot due to occurrence of preferential flow paths. Thus, the results of this study provide insight into the importance of crossflow in layered porous media to overcome the current challenges in capturing the importance of geological uncertainties in the current and future SCCO2 IOR/EOR projects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900098
2019-04-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Bayati, D., Saeedi, A., Myers, M., White, C. & Xie, Q.
    2018a. An Experimental Investigation of Immiscible CO2 Flooding Efficiency in Sandstone Reservoirs: Influence of Permeability Heterogeneity. SPE Europec featured at 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Copenhagen, Denmark: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Bayati, D., Saeedi, A., Myers, M., White, C., Xie, Q. & Clennell, B.
    2018b. Insight investigation of miscible SCCO2 Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection performance in heterogeneous sandstone reservoirs. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 28, 255–263.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Bayati, D., Saeedi, A., Xie, Q., Myers, M. B. & White, C.
    2018c. Influence of Permeability Heterogeneity on Miscible CO2 Flooding Efficiency in Sandstone Reservoirs: An Experimental Investigation. Transport in Porous Media, 125, PP 341–356.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alhamdan, M., Cinar, Y., Suicmez, V. S. & Dindoruk, B.
    2012. Experimental and numerical study of compositional two-phase displacements in layered porous media. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 98, 107–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Araktingi, U. & OrrJr, F.
    1993. Viscous fingering in heterogeneous porous media. SPE Advanced Technology Series, 1, 71–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Araktingi, U. G. & Orr, F. M., Jr.
    1990. Viscous Fingering, Gravity Segregation, and Reservoir Heterogeneity in Miscible Displacements in Vertical Cross Sections. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertin, H., Apaydin, O., Castanier, L. & Kovscek, A.
    Foam flow in heterogeneous porous media: Effect of crossflow. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 1998. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bikkina, P., Wan, J., Kim, Y., Kneafsey, T. J. & Tokunaga, T. K.
    2016. Influence of wettability and permeability heterogeneity on miscible CO2 flooding efficiency. Fuel, 166, 219–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brock, D. & OrrJr, F.
    Flow visualization of viscous fingering in heterogeneous porous media. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1991. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bunge, A. & Radke, C.
    1982. CO2 flooding strategy in a communicating layered reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 34, 2,746–2,756.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Burger, J., Springate, G. & Mohanty, K.
    1996. Experiments on bypassing during gasfloods in heterogeneous porous media. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 11, 109–115.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Burger, J. E. & Mohanty, K. K.
    1997. Mass Transfer From Bypassed Zones During Gas Injection. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Christensen, J. R., Stenby, E. H. & Skauge, A.
    Review of WAG field experience. International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition of Mexico, 1998. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cinar, Y., Jessen, K., Berenblyum, R., Juanes, R. & Orr, F. M., JR.
    2004. An Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Crossflow Effects in Two-Phase Displacements. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Houston, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dawe, R. A., Caruana, A. & Grattoni, C. A.
    2011. Immiscible displacement in cross-bedded heterogeneous porous media. Transport in Porous Media, 87, 335–353.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Debbabi, Y., Jackson, M. D., Hampson, G. J., Fitch, P. J. R. & Salinas, P.
    2017a. Viscous Crossflow in Layered Porous Media. Transport in Porous Media, 117, 281–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Debbabi, Y., Jackson, M. D., Hampson, G. J. & Salinas, P.
    2017b. Capillary Heterogeneity Trapping and Crossflow in Layered Porous Media. Transport in Porous Media, 120, 183–206.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dindoruk, B. & Firoozabadi, A.
    1997. Crossflow in Fractured/Layered Media Incorporating Gravity, Viscous, and Phase Behavior Effects: Part I-Formulation and Features in Layered Media. SPE Journal, 2, 120–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ding, M., Yuan, F., Wang, Y., Xia, X., Chen, W. & Liu, D.
    2017. Oil recovery from a CO2 injection in heterogeneous reservoirs: The influence of permeability heterogeneity, CO2-oil miscibility and injection pattern. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 44, 140–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fayers, F. J. & Lee, S.-T.
    1992. Crossflow Mechanisms by Gas Drive in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Firoozabadi, A. & Tan, J. C. T.
    1994. Miscible Displacement in Fractured Porous Media: Part II - Analysis. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Tulsa, Oklahoma: Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Georgiadis, A., Llovell, F., Bismarck, A., Blas, F. J., Galindo, A., Maitland, G. C., Trusler, J. P. M. & Jackson, G.
    2010. Interfacial tension measurements and modelling of (carbon dioxide+n-alkane) and (carbon dioxide+water) binary mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 55, 743–754.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hara, S. K. & Christman, P. G.
    1993. Investigation of a Cyclic Countercurrent Light-Oil/CO2 Immiscible Process. SPE Advanced Technology Series, 1, 159–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kortekaas, T. F.
    1985. Water/oil displacement characteristics in crossbedded reservoir zones. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25, 917–926.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kulkarni, M. M. & Rao, D. N.
    2005. Experimental Investigation of Miscible Secondary Gas Injection. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lv, P., Liu, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, L., Wu, B., Liu, S. & Song, Y.
    2017. Pore-scale investigation of effects of heterogeneity on CO2 geological storage using stratified sand packs. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 7, 972–987.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Marcelle-De Silva, J. & Dawe, R.
    2009. Experimental Studies of the Effects of Permeability Variations on Immiscible Flow. Petroleum Science and Technology, 27, 498–510.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mohanty, K. & Johnson, S.
    1993. Interpretation of laboratory gasfloods with multidimensional compositional modeling. SPE reservoir engineering, 8, 59–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pande, K. & Orr, F. M.
    1994. Effect of Viscous Crossflow on Miscibility Development in a Two-Layer Flow System: Part I - Ternary Vaporizing Gas Drives.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pande, K. K.
    1992. Effects of Gravity and Viscous Crossflow on Hydrocarbon Miscible Flood Performance in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Perrin, J.-C. & Benson, S.
    2010. An Experimental Study on the Influence of Sub-Core Scale Heterogeneities on CO2 Distribution in Reservoir Rocks. Transport in Porous Media, 82, 93–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Peters, B. M., Zhou, D. & Blunt, M. J.
    Experimental Investigation of Scaling Factors that Describe Miscible Floods in Layered. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 1998. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sahimi, M., Rasaei, M. R. & Haghighi, M.
    2006. Gas injection and fingering in porous media. Gas Transport in Porous Media. Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shaver, R., Robinson, R. & Gasem, K.
    2001. An automated apparatus for equilibrium phase compositions, densities, and interfacial tensions: data for carbon dioxide+ decane. Fluid phase equilibria, 179, 43–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stalkup, F. I.
    1983. Miscible displacement.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tungdumrongsub, S. & Muggeridge, A. H.
    Layering and oil recovery: the impact of permeability contrast, gravity, viscosity and dispersion. SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, 2010. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Verma, M. K.
    2015. Fundamentals of carbon dioxide-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR): A supporting document of the assessment methodology for hydrocarbon recovery using CO2-EOR associated with carbon sequestration, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yokoyama, Y. & Lake, L. W.
    The effects of capillary pressure on immiscible displacements in stratified porous media. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1981. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zapata, V. J. & Lake, L. W.
    1981. A Theoretical Analysis of Viscous Crossflow. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang, C., Oostrom, M., Grate, J. W., Wietsma, T. W. & Warner, M. G.
    2011. Liquid CO2 Displacement of Water in a Dual-Permeability Pore Network Micromodel. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 7581–7588.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhao, F., Hao, H., Hou, J., Hou, L. & Song, Z.
    2015. CO2 mobility control and sweep efficiency improvement using starch gel or ethylenediamine in ultra-low permeability oil layers with different types of heterogeneity. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 133, 52–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhao, Y., Song, Y., Liu, Y., Jiang, L. & Zhu, N.
    2011. Visualization of CO2 and oil immiscible and miscible flow processes in porous media using NMR micro-imaging. Petroleum Science, 8, 183–193.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900098
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900098
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error