1887

Abstract

Summary

Chemical flooding has been implemented and studied intensively as an EOR method. One such process, Low Salinity WaterFlooding (LSWF) has become increasingly applied. Simulations can be performed for these processes to predict behaviour and make field management decisions. These are costly and incur numerical errors. Analytical solutions to flow behaviour have been developed previously for waterflooding in reservoirs that consist of non-communicating layers. We extend that analysis here for chemical flooding, and in particular for LSWF. We also extend the analysis that we developed previously to include dispersion effects. We then compare the analytical predictions to the more realistic case of flow across communicating layers to assess crossflow effects. We derive a mathematical form of fractional flow theory for a set of non-communicating layers that can be used to predict fluid flow and solute transport including the location of waterfronts. This model corrects for the effects of numerical and physical dispersion. We examine the validity of this analytical model by comparing it to simulations of fluid flow behaviour in non-communicating layers first and then in communicating layers. We use dimensionless numbers that can be used to deduce the inter-layer relationships of the various fronts that form as a function of viscous crossflow. We examined models with different degrees of heterogeneity under various mobility ratios.

The analytical method worked very well compared to numerical simulations in the absence of cross-flow. Our results show that for virtually homogenous reservoirs, the crossflow has negligible effect on oil recovery. For moderately heterogeneous reservoirs, the crossflow has a negative effect reducing the recovery factor. Cross flow resulted in varying effects ranging from a reduced ultimate recovery of 2% or increased it by 9%, relative to the original oil in place. The former occurred for models with a mobility ratio at the leading formation waterfront that was less than one combined with low heterogeneity while the latter occurred for highly heterogeneous cases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900131
2019-04-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Ibadi, H., Stephen, K. and Mackay, E.
    , 2018. An Updated Fractional Flow Model of Low Salinity Water Flooding with Respect to the Impact of Salt Diffusion. SPE-191222-MS. In proceedings of the SPE Trinidad and Tobago Section Energy Resources Conference, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, 25–26 June, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , 2019a. Analytical Solution of Chemical Flooding in Heterogeneous Non-Communicating Layers with a Focus on Low Salinity Water Flooding. SPE-195446-MS. In proceedings of SPE Europec featured at 81st EAGE Annual Conference, London, UK, 3–6 June, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , 2019b. Insights into the fractional flow of low salinity water flooding in the light of solute dispersion and effective salinity interactions. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 174(3), pp. 1236–1248.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , 2019c. Novel Observations of Salinity Transport in Low-Salinity Waterflooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp. 22–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Al-Shalabi, E.W. and Sepehrnoori, K.
    , 2016. A comprehensive review of low salinity/engineered water injections and their applications in sandstone and carbonate rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 139.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , 2017. Low Salinity and Engineered Water Injection for Sandstone and Carbonate Reservoirs, Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AlSada, A. and Mackay, E.
    , 2017. Low Salinity Water Flooding Possible Mechanisms and the Impact of Injected Sulphate Variation on Oil Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs: Compositional Modelling Approach. In SPE Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Annual Technical Symposium and Exhibition, 24–27 Apri.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Alshawaf, M.H.
    , S.Krevor and A.Muggeridge, 2017. Analysis of Viscous Crossflow in Polymer Flooding. In IOR2017-19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery 24–27 April 2017, Stavanger, Norway. pp. 1–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Attar, A. and Muggeridge, A.
    , 2018. Low salinity water injection: Impact of physical diffusion, an aquifer and geological heterogeneity on slug size. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 166(July), pp. 1055–1070.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Debbabi, Y. et al., Debbabi, Y., Jackson, M., Hampson, G., Fitch, P. and Salinas, P.
    , 2017. Viscous Crossflow in Layered Porous Media. Transport in Porous Media, 117(2), pp. 281–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Goddin, C., Craig, F., Wilkes, J. O. and Tek, M.
    , 1966. A Numerical Study of Waterflood Performance In a Stratified System With Crossflow. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 18(6), pp. 765–771.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hussain, F., Zeinijahromi, A., Bedrikovetsky, P., Badalyan, A., Carageorgos, T. and Cinar, Y.
    , 2013. An experimental study of improved oil recovery through fines-assisted waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 109, pp. 187–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jackson, M.D., Al-Mahrouqi, D. and Vinogradov, J.
    , 2016. Zeta potential in oil-water-carbonate systems and its impact on oil recovery during controlled salinity water-flooding. Scientific Reports, 6(October), pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lager, A., Webb, K., Black, C., Singleton, M., Sorbie, K.
    , 2006. Low salinity oil recovery - An experimental investigation. Petrophysics, 49(1), pp. 28–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lake, L., Johns, R., Rossen, B., Pope, G.
    , 2014. Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery, SPE.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lake, L.W.
    , 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Maes, J. and Geiger, S.
    , 2018. Direct pore-scale reactive transport modelling of dynamic wettability changes induced by surface complexation. Advances in Water Resources, 111(June 2017), pp. 6–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mahani, H., Berg, S., Ilic, D., Bartels, W. and Joekar-Niasar, V.
    , 2015. Kinetics of Low-Salinity-Flooding Effect. Society of Petroleum Engineers, (February).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mahani, H. Sorop, T., Ligthelm, D., Brooks, D., Vledder, P., Mozahem, F. and Ali, Y.
    , 2011. Analysis of Field Responses to Low-salinity Waterflooding in Secondary and Tertiary Mode in Syria. in the proceedings of the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition,Vienna, Austria, 23–26 May.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Muggeridge, A. Cockin, A., Webb, K., Frampton, H., Collins, I.
    , Salino, P., 2014. Recovery rates , enhanced oil recovery and technological limits Recovery rates , enhanced oil recovery and technological limits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A372: 20120320.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nasralla, R., Mahani, H., van der Linde, H., Marcelis, F., Masalmeh, S., Sergienko, E., Brussee, N., Pieterse, S. and Basu, S.
    , 2018. Low salinity waterflooding for a carbonate reservoir: Experimental evaluation and numerical interpretation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 164(July 2017), pp. 640–654.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Or, D.
    , 2008. Scaling of capillary, gravity and viscous forces affecting flow morphology in unsaturated porous media. Advances in Water Resources, 31(9), pp. 1129–1136.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Peters, E.
    , 1983. Scaling Unstable Immiscible Displacements. SPE journal, (June), 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Puntervold, T., Strand, S., Ellouz, R. and Austad, T.
    , 2015. Modified seawater as a smart EOR fluid in chalk. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 133, pp. 440–443.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Purswani, P., Tawfik, M.S. and Karpyn, Z.T.
    , 2017. Factors and Mechanisms Governing Wettability Alteration by Chemically Tuned Waterflooding: A Review. Energy and Fuels, 31(8), pp. 7734–7745.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Seccombe, J., Lager, A., Jerauld, G., Jhaveri, B., Buikema, T., Bassler, S., Denis, J., Webb, K., Cockin, A. and Fueg, E.
    , 2010. Demonstration of Low-Salinity EOR at Interwell Scale, Endicott Field, Alaska. In the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 24–28 April.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheng, J.J.
    , 2013. Alkaline-Surfactant Flooding First Edit., Elsevier Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , 2014. Critical review of low-salinity waterflooding. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 120, pp. 216–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shotton, M.
    , Stephen, K. and Giddins, M.A., 2016. High-Resolution Studies of Polymer Flooding in Heterogeneous Layered.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sorbie, K.S.
    , 1991. Polymer-Improved Oil Recovery, Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sorbie, K.S. and Seright, R.S.
    , 1992. Gel Placement in Heterogeneous Systems With Crossflow. SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Yortsos, Y.C.
    , 1995. A theoretical analysis of vertical flow equilibrium. Transport in Porous Media, 18(2), pp. 107–129.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Zapata, V.J. and Lake, L.W.
    , 1981. A Theoretical Analysis of Viscous Crossflow. In proceedings of the 56th Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, San Antonio, Texas, October 5–7,SPE10111.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900131
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900131
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error