1887

Abstract

Summary

The wettability state of mineral surface relative to water and oil is a key factor for crude oil recovery from reservoirs. It appears particularly relevant to EOR by low salinity brine, where changes towards water wettability are looked for.

A very popular way of characterizing the wettability of the rock is through contact angle measurements. Changes in contact angle are most often attributed to the modification of the rock surface affinity to oil. These changes are then attempted to be correlated to oil production with the aim of identifying reservoir conditions favorable to low salinity injection. However, following Laplace-Young's equation, the contact angle can be changed also by a variation in oil-water interfacial tension. This latter effect has been generally overlooked. In this work, the contribution of interfacial tension change to static contact angle variation has systematically been taken into account by calculating the adhesion tension and the work of adhesion of oil to the rock surface. Two other techniques, namely Washburn capillary rise and flotation were used to investigate the correlation with static contact angle measurements. Washburn capillary rise method allowed calculating the ratio of dynamic adhesion tension of octane to water, while flotation was evaluated as a rapid screening method of wettability alteration. Various crude oils were investigated to check the possibility to anticipate the response to low-salinity water flooding from these laboratory experiments. The endogenous surface active species were first transferred from oil to water and then to the solid surface (silica and carbonate). The effect of changes on water composition (salinity, pH) on oil adhesion has been carefully investigated and the efficiency of low salinity brine to decrease the adhesion of oil (i.e. the work of adhesion) to the substrate, i.e. to remove the organic species adsorbed onto the surface, has been evaluated. The importance of running wettability measurements with synthetic brine, previously equilibrated with the crude oil is demonstrated. In particular, it is shown that neglecting changes in pH promoted by the contact with the crude can yield erroneous conclusions.

Two key points are stressed for proper evaluation of the adhesion of crude oil to the mineral at the lab scale in order to be more relevant in selecting reservoirs amenable to the low salinity injection technology.

-Use pre-equilibrated synthetic brines, more representative of reservoir conditions

-Compare the results through the work of adhesion, a quantity of thermodynamic significance, rather than through direct contact angle.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900180
2019-04-08
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al Mahrouqi, D., Vinogradov, J., & Jackson, M. D.
    (2017). Zeta potential of artificial and natural calcite in aqueous solution. Advances in colloid and interface science, 240, 60–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghunaim, A., Kirdponpattara, S., & Newby, B. M. Z.
    (2016). Techniques for determining contact angle and wettability of powders. Powder technology, 287, 201–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ameri, A., Kaveh, N. S., Rudolph, E. S. J., Wolf, K. H., Farajzadeh, R., & Bruining, J.
    (2013). Investigation on interfacial interactions among crude oil-brine-sandstone rock-CO2 by contact angle measurements. Energy & Fuels, 27(2), 1015–1025.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bijsterbosch, B. H.
    (1974). Characterization of silica surfaces by adsorption from solution. Investigations into the mechanism of adsorption of cationic surfactants. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 47(1), 186–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Binks, B. P., & Lumsdon, S. O.
    (2000). Influence of particle wettability on the type and stability of surfactant-free emulsions. Langmuir, 16(23), 8622–8631.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bohmer, M. R., & Koopal, L. K.
    (1992). Adsorption of ionic surfactants on constant charge Surfaces. Analysis based on a self-consistent field lattice model. Langmuir, 8(6), 1594–1602.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourrel, M., & Verzaro, F.
    (1998). Contrôle de la rupture des émulsions de bitume dans les applications routières. Rev Gén Routes Aérodr, 58–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, S. Y., Kaufman, Y., Kristiansen, K., Seo, D., Schrader, A. M., Alotaibi, M. B.
    , ... & Israelachvili, J. N. (2017). Effects of salinity on oil recovery (the “Dilution Effect”): Experimental and theoretical studies of crude oil/brine/carbonate surface restructuring and associated physicochemical interactions. Energy & Fuels, 31(9), 8925–8941.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Clint, J. H., & Wicks, A. C.
    (2001). Adhesion under water: surface energy considerations. International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 21(4), 267–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies, J. T., & Rideal, E. K.
    Interfacial Phenomena (Academic, New York, 1963).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Farzaneh, S. A., Sohrabi, M., Mills, J. R., Mahzari, P., & Ahmed, K.
    (2015, April). Oil Recovery Improvement from Low Salinity Waterflooding in a Clay-free Silica Core. In IOR 2015-18th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Harkins, W. D., & Feldman, A.
    (1922). Films. The spreading of liquids and the spreading coefficient. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 44(12), 2665–2685.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Healy, R. N., Reed, R. L., & Stenmark, D. G.
    (1976). Multiphase microemulsion systems. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 16(03), 147–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Israelachvili, J. N.
    (2011). Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucuara, G., Usuriaga, J., Campo, P., Sepulveda, E., & Pacheco, C.
    (2016, February). Damage Remediation in a Mature Field Reservoir by Applying a Customized Treatment Using Surface Active Additives and Diversion Technologies: Case Histories from San Francisco Field. In SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Muhammad, Z., & Rao, D. N.
    (2001, January). Compositional dependence of reservoir wettability. In SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mwangi, P., Brady, P. V., Radonjic, M., & Thyne, G.
    (2018). The effect of organic acids on wettability of sandstone and carbonate rocks. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 165, 428–435.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Passade-Boupat, N., Rondon Gonzalez, M., Hurtevent, C., Brocart, B., & Palermo, T.
    (2012, January). Risk assessment of calcium naphtenates and separation mechanisms of acidic crude oil. In SPE International Conference on Oilfield Scale. Society of Petroleum Engineers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Roger, K., & Cabane, B.
    (2012). Why are hydrophobic/water interfaces negatively charged?. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51(23), 5625–5628.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sohal, M. A., Thyne, G., & Søgaard, E. G.
    (2016). Novel application of the flotation technique to measure the wettability changes by ionically modified water for improved oil recovery in carbonates. Energy & Fuels, 30(8), 6306–6320.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sohrabi, M., Mahzari, P., Farzaneh, S. A., Mills, J. R., Tsolis, P., & Ireland, S.
    (2017). Novel insights into mechanisms of oil recovery by use of low-salinity-water injection. SPE Journal, 22(02), 407–416.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Song, J., Zeng, Y., Wang, L., Duan, X., Puerto, M., Chapman, W. G.
    , ... & Hirasaki, G. J. (2017). Surface complexation modeling of calcite zeta potential measurements in brines with mixed potential determining ions (Ca2+, CO32−, Mg2+, SO42−) for characterizing carbonate wettability. Journal of colloid and interface science, 506, 169–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Washburn, E. W.
    (1921). The dynamics of capillary flow. Physical review, 17(3), 273.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yousef, A. A., Al-Saleh, S. H., Al-Kaabi, A., & Al-Jawfi, M. S.
    (2011). Laboratory investigation of the impact of injection-water salinity and ionic content on oil recovery from carbonate reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 14(05), 578–593.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900180
Loading
/content/papers/10.3997/2214-4609.201900180
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error